Dynamic Bias Algorithms for Energy Storage State of Charge Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Energy storage devices in power grids face challenges in maintaining optimal performance and longevity while providing ancillary services, as they often overheat or deplete, leading to impaired functionality and potential warranty voidance, without violating Minimum Technical Requirements (MTRs) set by grid operators.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of dynamic bias algorithms, such as the Dynamic Bias Algorithm, Set Point Autopilot Algorithm, Fixed Signal Bias Algorithm, Signal Bias Range Maintaining Algorithm, State of Charge Range Maintaining Algorithm, Operational Limits Algorithm, and Intelligent Algorithm Selection, which adjust the response to grid operator signals to optimize state of charge and temperature management, ensuring compliance with MTRs and maximizing performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If energy storage devices respond fully to grid operator signals to maximize performance scores, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to overheating and depletion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance scoreVSAvoiddevice functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the response to grid operator signals based on real-time monitoring of device state (temperature, charge level). The bias algorithm modifies the setpoint dynamically to reduce commanded output when the device approaches thermal or capacity limits, preventing overheating and depletion while maintaining high performance scores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback monitoring of temperature and state of charge, using this information to adjust the bias algorithm parameters. When sensors detect approaching limits, the feedback loop reduces the response magnitude to signals, preventing violation of operational constraints while maintaining compliance with MTRs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Power

If energy storage devices operate at maximum capacity to provide ancillary services, then power is improved, but temperature increases leading to overheating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveancillary service capacityVSAvoiddevice temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The bias algorithm dynamically scales the power response based on temperature feedback. When temperature approaches critical thresholds, the algorithm automatically reduces the commanded power output proportionally, maintaining thermal safety while continuing to provide ancillary services at reduced but still valuable capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If energy storage devices respond aggressively to grid signals to maximize revenue, then productivity is improved, but device longevity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue generationVSAvoiddevice longevity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by responding to grid signals with reduced magnitude when approaching operational limits. Instead of fully executing aggressive charge/discharge commands that would maximize short-term revenue but degrade the device, the bias algorithm applies scaled-down responses that extend device life while maintaining acceptable revenue generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If energy storage devices maintain strict compliance with MTRs to avoid penalties, then reliability is improved, but productivity decreases due to conservative operation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMTR complianceVSAvoidperformance score
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically optimizes the balance between compliance and performance by adjusting the bias in real-time. When device state allows, the algorithm maximizes response to signals to achieve high performance scores. When approaching limits, it smoothly transitions to conservative operation that maintains MTR compliance, avoiding the need for fixed conservative settings that would permanently limit productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10886742B2Method and system for performance management of an energy storage device
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 FLUENCE ENERGY LLC
  • US10886742B2 patent drawing
  • US10886742B2 patent drawing
  • US10886742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Approaches for managing and maintaining a state of charge of an energy storage device by adjusting (biasing) responses to electrical grid operator commands to perform ancillary services are disclosed. In embodiments, methods and systems regulate a set point regulation in an energy system. In an embodiment, a method determines when the set point needs to be changed, calculates a new set point, and moves the output of the system from an old set point to the new set point at a defined ramp rate. The method then incorporates, as part of a set point algorithm, the capability to restore the energy storage device to a desirable state of charge (SOC). Embodiments implement Dynamic Bias, SOC and Signal Bias Range Maintaining, Operational Limits, and Fixed Signal Bias algorithms and perform Intelligent Algorithm Selection to manage and maintain the SOC of an energy storage device by biasing responses to grid operator commands.