Dynamic Bidding for Order Fulfillment in Virtual Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In virtual reality (VR) shopping environments, simultaneous shopping by consumers from various locations can lead to complications and prevent order fulfillment due to issues like inventory availability, logistical costs, and operational limitations of item providers.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), and Internet of Things (IoT) devices to identify challenges in order fulfillment and initiate dynamic bidding sessions with service providers to ensure timely and cost-effective delivery of items to consumers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the item provider uses their own inventory and logistics to fulfill orders, then they maintain control over quality and service, but they cannot serve customers in locations where they have no operational presence or sufficient inventory

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery location coverageVSAvoidlogistics network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces third-party service providers as intermediaries between the item provider and customers in remote locations. These intermediaries handle logistics and delivery operations locally, enabling the item provider to expand delivery coverage without directly establishing operational presence in every location. The bidding session mechanism coordinates these intermediaries dynamically based on real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the item provider establishes operational presence in multiple locations to serve local customers, then they can fulfill orders directly, but the operational costs and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment reliabilityVSAvoidoperational structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic bidding session system that adapts the service provider selection based on real-time conditions such as inventory availability, logistical costs, and delivery requirements. Instead of a fixed operational structure, the system dynamically determines which service providers to engage for each order, optimizing reliability while avoiding the complexity of permanent multi-location operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system selects service providers based on fixed criteria, then the selection process is simple and fast, but it cannot adapt to real-time changes in inventory, costs, or delivery conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to real-time conditionsVSAvoidorder processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent conducts bidding sessions in advance of actual order fulfillment, pre-evaluating and selecting service providers based on current conditions. This preliminary action allows the system to adapt to real-time changes in inventory, costs, and delivery requirements while maintaining efficient order processing speed during actual fulfillment, as the selection work is already completed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If the item provider offers free or low-cost delivery to compete, then they attract more customers, but the logistical costs may exceed acceptable thresholds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer accessibilityVSAvoidlogistical cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts delivery pricing parameters based on real-time bidding results from service providers. By changing the cost parameter according to actual logistical conditions, the system can offer competitive pricing when costs are low while maintaining profitability when costs are high, thus balancing customer accessibility with cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250117844A1Virtual environment with dynamic bidding for services to process an order
Publication Date: 2025.04.10 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250117844A1 patent drawing
  • US20250117844A1 patent drawing
  • US20250117844A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to a present invention embodiment, a system for processing an order in a computerized environment identifies an item selected by a user in the computerized environment. The system determines that a provider of the item is unable to provide the item to a delivery location based on one or more conditions. A bidding session is conducted for a plurality of service providers to select one or more service providers with services enabling the item to be provided to the delivery location. A transaction for the item is performed to deliver the item to the delivery location via the provider of the item and the one or more service providers. Embodiments of the present invention further include a method and computer program product for processing an order in a computerized environment in substantially the same manner described above.