Dynamic Binaural Frequency Difference for Brain Wave Induction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current brain wave induction methods are inefficient as they maintain a constant frequency difference between sound waves, which limits their ability to effectively induce specific brain waves, leading to poor induction results.

Innovation Solution

A method that simultaneously provides sound waves to each ear with a frequency difference that automatically changes over time, allowing for segmental changes and adjustments between 0.1 Hz and 12 Hz, with specific changes held constant for several seconds to induce specific brain waves, such as α, θ, δ, and β waves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a constant frequency difference is maintained between sound waves, then the device complexity is reduced, but the brain wave induction efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrain wave induction efficiencyVSAvoidfrequency control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a static constant frequency difference to a dynamic time-varying frequency difference. The frequency difference between left and right ear sound waves is automatically adjusted over time according to a preset pattern, allowing the system to adapt to individual brain wave induction requirements while maintaining automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the frequency difference parameter over time. Instead of maintaining a fixed frequency difference, the system automatically varies this parameter according to a predetermined time-based pattern, enabling effective induction across multiple brain wave frequency ranges without requiring complex manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the frequency difference is automatically changed along with time, then the adaptability to individual differences is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to frequency sensitivityVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies self-service by automatically adjusting the frequency difference without requiring user intervention. The earphone device autonomously varies the frequency difference between left and right ear sound waves according to a preset time-based pattern, enabling the system to adapt to individual brain wave induction requirements while maintaining automated control throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that allow the system to automatically adjust frequency differences based on detected brain wave responses. This enables the system to adapt to individual frequency sensitivity variations while maintaining ease of operation through automated control algorithms that process feedback and adjust parameters without user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the frequency difference is changed multi-segmentally, then the brain wave induction coverage is improved, but the loss of time for adjustments increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinduction coverageVSAvoidtime for frequency adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by implementing multi-segmental frequency difference changes where the frequency difference is adjusted in discrete segments over time. Each segment maintains a specific frequency difference for a predetermined duration, allowing the system to cover multiple brain wave induction ranges systematically. The automatic timing and transition between segments minimize adjustment time while maximizing induction coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly enhances brain wave induction efficiency, achieving higher energy levels and longer duration of induced brain waves compared to traditional methods, accommodating individual differences in frequency sensitivity and maintaining effective induction across multiple frequency ranges.

Implementation Method 1

simultaneously providing a first sound wave to a left ear of a user and a second sound wave to a right ear of the user, wherein there is a frequency difference between a first frequency of the first sound wave and a second frequency of the second sound wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBinaural beat: Beat (acoustics)

Data Source

PatentUS20240261531A1Brain wave induction method
Publication Date: 2024.08.08 COTRON CORPORATION
  • US20240261531A1 patent drawing
  • US20240261531A1 patent drawing
  • US20240261531A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A brain wave induction method is provided. In the method, a first sound wave to a left ear of a user and a second sound wave to a right ear of the user are simultaneously provided. There is a frequency difference between a first frequency of the first sound wave and a second frequency of the second sound wave. The frequency difference is automatically changed along with time.