Dynamic Bio-Nanoparticle Elements for Cargo Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing nanoparticle technologies face limitations in flexibility, functionality, and ease of cargo attachment, particularly in forming nanoscale elements that can operate effectively in vivo and in vitro without the constraints of fully formed cage structures.

Innovation Solution

The development of dynamic bio-nanoparticle elements formed from self-assembling protein molecules, such as Clathrin and Coatomer proteins, which can form minimalist, non-cage nanoscale elements with enhanced functionalization capabilities, allowing for simplified fabrication, cargo attachment, and cellular interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If fully formed cage structures are used, then structural stability is improved, but flexibility and ease of cargo attachment deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the traditional fully formed cage structure into separate components: a protein shell and cargo attachment sites. This segmentation allows the shell to maintain structural stability while the attachment sites provide flexibility for cargo loading, resolving the contradiction between stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic elements that allow the nanoparticle structure to transition between different states. The cargo attachment mechanism can dynamically bind and release cargo, providing flexibility while the core shell maintains structural stability, thus resolving the contradiction between rigidity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If fully formed cage structures are used, then structural integrity is improved, but cargo attachment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidcargo attachment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the cage structure into a stable shell and separate cargo attachment components, the patent simplifies the manufacturing process. The shell can be produced independently with high structural integrity, while cargo attachment is simplified through modular design, resolving the contradiction between strength and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary elements that facilitate cargo attachment without compromising shell integrity. These intermediaries act as mediators between the stable shell structure and the cargo, simplifying the attachment process while maintaining structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If minimalist non-cage elements are used, then fabrication simplicity and cargo attachment ease are improved, but stability and rigidity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication simplicityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges minimalist non-cage elements with a protein shell structure. This combination retains the fabrication simplicity of minimalist approaches while the protein shell provides the necessary stability and rigidity, resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material strategies by combining protein shell components with synthetic or biological cargo attachment elements. This composite approach achieves both fabrication simplicity and structural stability by leveraging the advantages of different material types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These bio-nanoparticle elements demonstrate improved stability, rigidity, and functionality, enabling efficient cargo delivery, cellular interaction, and drug delivery systems, including the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and operate in the central nervous system.

Implementation Method 1

dynamic bio-nanoparticle elements formed from materials comprised of self-assembling protein molecules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-assembly: Self-Assembly

Data Source

PatentUS12239743B2Dynamic bio-nanoparticle platforms
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 METAQOR LLC
  • US12239743B2 patent drawing
  • US12239743B2 patent drawing
  • US12239743B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention in suitable embodiments is directed to dynamic bio-nanoparticle elements and bio-nanoparticle platforms employing such bio-nanoparticle elements. In one aspect, one or more elements of one or more types, formed from isolated, synthetic and or recombinant amino acid residues comprising in whole or in part one or more types of Clathrin and or Coatomer I/II proteins of one or more isoforms, execute one or more functions and or effect one or more ends, in vivo and or in vitro.