Dynamic Biomarker Collection Protocol for Structured Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current collection devices for chronic diseases like diabetes lack structured protocols for biomarker collection, leading to uninterpreted measurements and patient burden, often resulting in inefficient data collection and discouragement of further therapy optimization.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that utilize a processor and memory to classify similar biomarker samples, calculate expected values, and adjust collection protocols based on compliance with set criteria, ensuring contextualized data collection and providing guidance to patients through alarms, tutorials, and prompts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If unstructured biomarker collection is used, then patient burden is reduced, but data interpretability and clinical value deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient burdenVSAvoiddata interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The collection protocol is segmented into multiple discrete steps, each with specific guidance on what to measure, when to measure it, and how to record it. This segmentation provides structure to the collection process without overwhelming the patient, breaking down the complex task into manageable segments that improve both interpretability and patient experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining the collection protocol, including what biomarkers to measure, under what conditions, and how to interpret the results. This preliminary structuring is done before the actual collection, so patients receive clear guidance without having to navigate complex decisions during the collection process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If multiple collection requests are made by different clinicians, then comprehensive data collection is improved, but patient burden and collection efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive data collectionVSAvoidcollection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple collection requests from different clinicians are merged into a single unified protocol. The system consolidates overlapping requests, eliminates redundant measurements, and integrates complementary data collection goals into one coordinated plan, thereby reducing patient burden while maintaining comprehensive data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The collection protocol is designed to serve multiple clinicians and multiple purposes simultaneously. A single protocol can support diagnostic questions, therapy optimization, and monitoring needs from different providers, making the system universally applicable across various clinical scenarios without requiring separate collection plans for each clinician.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual programming of collection schedules is required, then device flexibility is improved, but device complexity and ease of use deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice flexibilityVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically generating and managing the collection protocol based on the clinical questions and patient data provided. Instead of requiring manual programming, the system autonomously creates the schedule, reminds patients, and coordinates the collection process, thereby maintaining flexibility while eliminating programming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes to adapt the collection protocol dynamically. Rather than requiring manual reprogramming, the system adjusts collection timing, frequency, and parameters automatically based on patient responses, clinical progress, and protocol requirements, maintaining flexibility through automated parameter modification rather than manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2710502B1Dynamic data collection
Publication Date: 2018.12.12 ROCHE DIABETES CARE GMBH
  • EP2710502B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2710502B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2710502B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

Embodiments of methods of performing a structured collection protocol on a collection de- vice comprise providing a plurality of prior biomarker sample, wherein the prior biomarker samples comprise at least one measured value and plurality of contextualized data components linked to the prior biomarker samples, setting a first criterion, wherein the first criterion classifies prior biomarker samples as similar if prior biomarker samples share at least one identical contextualized data component, grouping biomarker samples that are determined to be similar based on the first criterion, calculating expected values for future biomarker samples which satisfy the first criterion, wherein the calculation is based on at least a subset of the group of similar prior biomarker samples, setting a second criterion, wherein the second criterion is an acceptable variance from the calculated expected values, a threshold, or both, collecting one or more biomarker samples which satisfy the first criterion, and evaluating via the processor the compliance of the collected biomarker samples with the second criterion.