Dynamic Language Block Caching and Linking for Execution Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dynamic programming languages execute slower than static programming languages due to runtime operations such as type-checking and variable type changes, making it desirable to enhance the efficiency of code execution in computing environments.

Innovation Solution

A technical computing environment (TCE) that segments programs into blocks with deterministic or inferable variable types, generates multiple clones for each block, and efficiently selects and links these clones for execution using a block cache and execution engine, optimizing execution by caching compiled blocks and linking them for efficient execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic programming languages are used to provide flexible runtime operations, then adaptability is improved, but execution speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveruntime flexibilityVSAvoidexecution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The program is divided into multiple blocks with deterministic or inferable variable types. Each block represents a segment of code that can be independently compiled and cached, allowing the system to maintain dynamic language flexibility while improving execution speed through selective compilation of type-stable segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis to identify blocks with deterministic or inferable variable types before execution. These blocks are pre-compiled and cached, so that during runtime, the interpreter can directly execute pre-compiled code without performing type-checking, thus maintaining adaptability while improving execution speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If type-checking and variable type changes are performed at runtime, then adaptability is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic type handlingVSAvoidexecution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The program is segmented into blocks that are analyzed for type determinism. Blocks with deterministic types are separated from those requiring runtime type-checking, allowing efficient execution of type-stable segments while maintaining dynamic type handling where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Type analysis and block compilation are performed preliminarily before execution. The system identifies and pre-compiles blocks with deterministic types, caching them for efficient runtime execution. This preliminary action eliminates the need for runtime type-checking in these blocks, improving productivity while preserving dynamic type handling capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If blocks are cached and clones are generated for different types, then execution efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution efficiencyVSAvoidblock management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates type-specific clones of code blocks from a single template. Instead of maintaining separate compilation logic for each type, the system creates cloned versions of blocks tailored to specific type requirements, simplifying block management while improving execution efficiency through specialized compiled code.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

A single block template serves multiple purposes by generating different type-specific clones. The universal block structure can be instantiated for different variable types, reducing the need for separate block definitions and management complexity while maintaining execution efficiency through type-optimized clones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8943474B1Code generation and execution for dynamic programming languages
Publication Date: 2015.01.27 MATHWORKS INC
  • US8943474B1 patent drawing
  • US8943474B1 patent drawing
  • US8943474B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device receives programming code, corresponding to a dynamic programming language, that is to be executed by a computing environment, and executes the programming code. When executing the programming code, the device maintains a program counter that identifies an execution location within the programming code, and select blocks of the programming code based on the program counter. The blocks correspond to segments of the programming code, and are associated with type-based constraints that relate to types of variables that are used by the block. When executing the programming code, the device also compiles the selected blocks, caches the compiled blocks along with the type-based constraints, generates linking information between certain ones of the compiled blocks based on the type-based constraints, and executes the compiled blocks in an order based on the program counter, the type-based constraints, and the linking information.