Dynamic Language Block Caching for Execution Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dynamic programming languages execute slower than static programming languages due to the need for frequent re-compilation and resource allocation, especially when additional constraints are back-propagated, leading to inefficient computing performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a block caching system that clones compiled blocks with original constraints without additional constraints associated with linked blocks, reducing the need for re-compilation and optimizing resource usage by selecting the correct block for execution based on deterministic type analysis and constraint matching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If dynamic programming languages perform type-checking and other operations at runtime, then flexibility and ease of operation are improved, but execution speed and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidexecution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs type-checking and constraint validation operations at compile-time rather than runtime. The compiler analyzes types, validates constraints, and generates optimized code before execution, eliminating the need for frequent runtime type-checking while maintaining the flexibility of dynamic programming languages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If frequent re-compilation is performed to handle additional constraints, then adaptability is improved, but processing time and productivity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstraint handlingVSAvoidre-compilation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs comprehensive constraint analysis and type validation during the initial compilation phase. The compiler generates optimized code that incorporates all constraint checks upfront, allowing the program to execute efficiently without requiring frequent re-compilation when constraints are encountered during runtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates specialized versions or copies of code blocks that are pre-optimized for specific constraint scenarios. Instead of re-compiling the entire program, the system can select from pre-generated code variants that match the current constraint environment, significantly reducing adaptation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If resource allocation is performed frequently during execution, then adaptability is improved, but computing performance and productivity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource managementVSAvoidcomputing performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The compiler performs resource allocation and memory management decisions during the compilation phase rather than at runtime. Type information and constraint analysis results from compilation are used to pre-allocate resources and optimize memory usage, eliminating the need for frequent resource allocation operations during program execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9135027B1Code generation and execution for dynamic programming languages
Publication Date: 2015.09.15 MATHWORKS INC
  • US9135027B1 patent drawing
  • US9135027B1 patent drawing
  • US9135027B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device may identify a first compiled block with an original constraint and an additional constraint. The first compiled block may be identified based on a program counter value and may include compiled information relating to a first segment of program code, linking information associated with a second compiled block, and information distinguishing the original constraint from the additional constraint. The original constraint may relate to a type of variable used in the first segment of programming code. The additional constraint may relate to a variable used in a second segment of programming code associated with the second compiled block. The device may copy information of the first compiled block to generate a third compiled block that lacks the additional constraint. The device may execute the third compiled block to execute a program associated with the programming code.