Dynamic Block Size Selection for Image Encoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing apparatuses for terrestrial digital broadcasting struggle to optimize image quality by inadequately setting block sizes for orthogonal transformation, which affects encoding efficiency and noise reduction based on genre information and other factors.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that receive genre information and use a selection unit to determine a block size for orthogonal transformation, allowing for dynamic adjustment of block sizes based on genre-specific parameters and other information like broadcast station and event details to prioritize noise reduction or encoding efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed block size is used for orthogonal transformation, then the device complexity is reduced, but the image quality and encoding efficiency deteriorate because the block size cannot be optimized for different genre characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblock size determination complexityVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the block size adjustable rather than fixed. The block size determination unit dynamically selects appropriate block sizes (e.g., 4×4, 8×8, 16×16) based on genre information and image characteristics, allowing the system to adapt to different content types and optimize image quality for each genre.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of block size based on genre information. Different genre categories (news, sports, entertainment, etc.) are associated with different optimal block sizes, and the system modifies the block size parameter accordingly to achieve better encoding efficiency and image quality for each genre.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If genre information is used to determine block size, then the encoding efficiency and image quality improve, but the device complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing the correspondence between genre information and block sizes. The block size determination unit uses pre-defined rules and tables that map genre categories to optimal block sizes, eliminating the need for complex real-time calculations and reducing processing complexity while maintaining high encoding efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces genre information as an intermediary element that bridges the gap between content characteristics and encoding parameters. Instead of directly analyzing complex image features to determine block size, the system uses genre information as a mediator to simplify the decision-making process while still achieving genre-optimized encoding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If larger block sizes are used for orthogonal transformation, then the encoding efficiency improves due to fewer transformations, but the noise reduction capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding efficiencyVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different block sizes for different regions or types of content based on genre characteristics. Instead of using a uniform block size for all content, the system selectively applies appropriate block sizes (4×4 for noise-prone content, 8×8 or 16×16 for efficiency-critical content) according to the genre, achieving both noise reduction and encoding efficiency in different contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9414089B2Image processing apparatus and image processing method
Publication Date: 2016.08.09 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US9414089B2 patent drawing
  • US9414089B2 patent drawing
  • US9414089B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes a receiving unit configured to receive image data of program content and genre information relating to the program content, a selection unit configured to select a size selection parameter for causing the genre information received by the receiving unit to be reflected in a block size, a determination unit configured to determine a block size in accordance with the size selection parameter selected by the selection unit, the block size being used for orthogonal transformation, and an orthogonal transformation unit configured to perform orthogonal transformation on the image data received by the receiving unit at the block size determined by the determination unit.