Dynamic Boundary Adjustment for Touch Input Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Touch-sensitive displays on portable electronic devices face challenges in efficiently managing user input and providing feedback, especially when handling continuous touches with unintended movements, which can lead to inaccurate navigation and information manipulation due to limited space and size constraints.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves a method for updating boundaries on a touch-sensitive display based on continuous touch locations, providing visual, audible, and tactile feedback, and adjusting the distance between boundaries to minimize the impact of unintended movements, allowing for precise control and intuitive user interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the touch-sensitive display size is decreased to improve portability, then device portability is improved, but the accuracy of touch input and navigation deteriorates due to limited space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice portabilityVSAvoidtouch input accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic boundary adjustment where the distance between boundaries is automatically modified based on detected touch movement patterns. When unintended movements are detected, the system increases the distance between boundaries to reduce sensitivity, while maintaining normal distance for intentional touches. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain high touch input accuracy on small displays without sacrificing portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If the distance between boundaries is increased to reduce sensitivity to unintended movements, then touch input stability is improved, but the precision for intentional navigation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch input stabilityVSAvoidnavigation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts boundary distances based on real-time analysis of touch movement characteristics. When a touch is detected as intentional (following a deliberate path), the boundary distance is maintained at a normal level for precise navigation. When unintended movements are detected (erratic or accidental touches), the boundary distance is automatically increased to reduce sensitivity and improve stability. This dynamic switching resolves the contradiction between stability and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors touch patterns and adjusts boundary distances accordingly. The feedback loop analyzes touch velocity, direction changes, and pressure patterns to distinguish between intentional and unintended movements, then provides appropriate feedback by adjusting boundary sensitivity in real-time, maintaining both stability and precision as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8350818B2Touch-sensitive display method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2013.01.08 MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LTD
  • US8350818B2 patent drawing
  • US8350818B2 patent drawing
  • US8350818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes detecting a continuous touch on a touch-sensitive display. A position of one or more boundaries is updated when the continuous touch crosses a first boundary of the one or more boundaries. Feedback is provided when the continuous touch crosses the first boundary.