Dynamic Braking Control for Dual-Bearing Reel Spools

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing braking apparatuses for dual-bearing reels struggle to precisely control spool braking, leading to excessive or deficient braking during casting, especially when dealing with varying fishing line parameters and changing environmental conditions such as wind, resulting in reduced flight distance and increased backlash.

Innovation Solution

A braking apparatus with an electrically controllable spool braking device, rotational speed detection, and a control system that adjusts braking forces based on estimated tension values and rotational speed changes, using a first braking force for a predetermined period followed by a second braking force calculated from the rotational speed change, and repeating this process to adapt to changing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed braking force is applied to the spool during casting, then the spool can be braked effectively to prevent backlash, but the braking becomes excessive or deficient when fishing line parameters or environmental conditions change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacklash preventionVSAvoidadaptation to varying conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The braking force is made dynamic rather than fixed. The control device adjusts the braking force in real-time based on detected rotational speed and calculated tension values. The system transitions from a static braking approach to a dynamic one where braking force varies according to actual casting conditions, resolving the contradiction between reliable backlash prevention and adaptability to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by detecting rotational speed, calculating tension values, and using this information to adjust braking force. The control device continuously monitors casting conditions and modifies braking force accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to varying fishing line parameters and environmental conditions while maintaining effective backlash prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a strong braking force is applied to prevent backlash, then backlash is suppressed, but the flight distance of the lure is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacklash suppressionVSAvoidflight distance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies braking force selectively and proportionally rather than continuously at maximum intensity. By detecting actual tension values and rotational speed, the control device applies only the necessary braking force to prevent backlash, avoiding excessive braking that would reduce flight distance. The braking is calibrated to match actual casting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The braking force parameter is dynamically adjusted based on detected rotational speed and calculated tension values. Rather than maintaining a constant strong braking force, the system varies the braking parameter according to actual casting conditions, applying stronger braking only when necessary to prevent backlash and reducing braking when conditions allow for longer flight distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If braking force is increased after tension reduction is detected, then backlash prevention is enhanced, but excessive braking occurs during the latter half of casting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacklash preventionVSAvoidcasting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The braking force is dynamically adjusted throughout the casting process based on real-time detection of rotational speed and calculation of tension values. Rather than applying increased braking force after tension reduction detection, the system continuously adapts braking force to match actual casting conditions, preventing both excessive and deficient braking during different phases of the cast.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control device uses continuous feedback from rotational speed detection and tension calculation to adjust braking force throughout the casting process. This feedback mechanism prevents the premature or excessive braking that would occur with fixed timing-based control, ensuring braking force is optimized for each phase of casting to maintain both backlash prevention and casting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution improves the precision of spool braking, reducing backlash and ensuring optimal braking force, thereby extending the flight distance and maintaining consistent performance across different fishing line types and environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a rotational speed detection device (detector) for detecting a rotational speed of the spool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational speed detection:

Implementation Method 2

a spool braking device (brake) for braking a spool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10575508B2Braking apparatus for dual-bearing reel
Publication Date: 2020.03.03 SHIMANO INC
  • US10575508B2 patent drawing
  • US10575508B2 patent drawing
  • US10575508B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A braking device for a spool that is rotatably supported by a reel body includes a spool braking device, a rotational speed detector, and an electronic controller. The spool braking device is configured to brake a spool in an electrically controllable manner. The rotational speed detector is configured to detect a rotational speed of the spool. The electronic controller is configured to control the spool braking device to brake the spool with a first braking force for a first predetermined period of time, and control the spool braking device to brake the spool with a second braking force that is based on a change in the rotational speed after the first predetermined period of time has elapsed.