Dynamic Call Handling Workflow Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Call handling treatments in contact centers are typically static and inflexible, making it difficult to assess and optimize their sequence, leading to suboptimal performance in meeting service level metrics such as within threshold abandons, which can impact customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that dynamically manages call handling treatments by monitoring performance indicators, determining associations between treatments and caller behavior, and altering workflows in real-time or during periodic reviews to promote, demote, add, or remove treatments based on observed deviations, allowing for dynamic re-programming of workflows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If call handling treatments are made static and inflexible, then system complexity is reduced, but service level attainment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow complexityVSAvoidservice level attainment
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic workflows that automatically adjust call handling treatments based on real-time performance data and caller behavior patterns. The system monitors key performance indicators and dynamically modifies treatment sequences, agent assignments, and routing decisions without requiring manual reconfiguration, thus maintaining service level attainment while avoiding excessive complexity through automated adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors performance indicators and caller behavior, using this feedback to automatically adjust and optimize call handling treatments. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from past interactions and dynamically improve service level attainment without increasing operational complexity, as the optimization is driven by automated data-driven decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If call handling treatments are made static and inflexible, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow management easeVSAvoidtreatment sequence adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service optimization by automatically monitoring performance data and adjusting call handling treatments without requiring manual intervention. The automated workflows self-adapt to changing conditions and performance requirements, maintaining ease of operation while achieving high adaptability through data-driven automatic reconfiguration of treatment sequences and routing logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes operational parameters such as treatment sequencing, duration, and selection based on monitored performance indicators and caller behavior. This automatic parameter adjustment allows the system to adapt to different scenarios and optimize service levels without requiring complex manual reconfiguration, thus maintaining ease of operation while achieving versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If call handling treatments are optimized dynamically, then service level attainment is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice level attainmentVSAvoidworkflow management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automated feedback loops to monitor performance indicators and dynamically adjust call handling treatments. This feedback-driven approach improves service level attainment by continuously optimizing treatments based on real-time data, while managing complexity through automation rather than manual processes, as the system self-regulates based on performance metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual workflow management mechanisms with automated computer-implemented systems that dynamically optimize call handling treatments. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with automated software-based solutions improves service level attainment through continuous optimization while managing complexity through algorithmic decision-making rather than human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If call handling treatments are optimized dynamically, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidworkflow management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves self-service optimization by automatically monitoring performance data and adjusting call handling treatments to improve operational efficiency. This automated self-optimization improves productivity by reducing call abandonments and improving service levels, while managing complexity through automation rather than requiring complex manual management processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes operational parameters such as treatment sequencing, duration, and selection based on monitored performance indicators. This automatic parameter optimization improves productivity by efficiently routing calls and managing treatments, while managing complexity through automated algorithmic decision-making rather than manual configuration and management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8374327B2Management of call handling treatments
Publication Date: 2013.02.12 AVAYA INC
  • US8374327B2 patent drawing
  • US8374327B2 patent drawing
  • US8374327B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The provision of call handling treatments to callers interacting with an automated call-handling system is managed by, for each of a plurality of callers, providing a sequence of call handling treatments to the caller in accordance with workflows; monitoring a measurable performance indicator associated with that caller's behavior; determining an association between the performance indicator and the call handling treatments provided to the caller; and recording the association. Then, based on the recorded associations, the system determines a pattern of deviation in the performance indicator attributable to the call handling treatments; and alters the workflow in response to the deviation by making a change in the workflow selected from promoting a call handling treatment to an earlier point in the workflow; demoting a call handling treatment to a later point in the workflow; adding a call handling treatment to the workflow; and removing a call handling treatment from the workflow.