Dynamic Cash Replenishment for Transaction Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The periodic replenishment of cash in transaction machines is inefficient and difficult to balance, as it requires frequent collection and refilling, with varying float levels needed across different machines and locations, leading to unnecessary storage and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A method that monitors monetary transactions to determine the net payout and probability density function for currency exhaustion, iteratively adjusting currency allocations to calculate the optimum replenishment period and level, using transaction history data locally or remotely to optimize currency item replenishment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If periodic replenishment with predetermined float levels is used, then adequate cash supply for dispensing is maintained, but replenishment operations become time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecash supply adequacyVSAvoidreplenishment operation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static predetermined float levels to dynamic replenishment quantities determined by actual transaction data. The system continuously monitors transactions and adjusts replenishment amounts based on observed payout patterns, making the cash management system adaptive rather than fixed. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining reliability through data-driven adequacy while reducing time through optimized replenishment frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using historical transaction data to inform future replenishment decisions. The system monitors actual cash payouts, analyzes patterns by denomination and time period, and uses this feedback to calculate optimal replenishment quantities. This closed-loop approach ensures adequate cash supply is maintained based on actual usage while minimizing unnecessary replenishment operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If higher float levels are maintained, then continuous transaction machine functioning is ensured, but large volumes of cash are unnecessarily stored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous functioningVSAvoidcash storage volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting cash quantities based on transaction analysis. Instead of maintaining fixed high float levels across all machines, the system varies replenishment parameters (quantity, frequency, timing) based on observed payout patterns. This resolves the contradiction by ensuring continuous functioning through data-driven adequacy while minimizing unnecessary cash storage through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by tailoring cash allocations to specific machine characteristics and locations. The system analyzes transaction data for each machine individually, considering local factors such as location-based usage patterns and machine-specific payout rates. This allows each machine to maintain locally-optimized cash levels that ensure continuous functioning without contributing to overall unnecessary cash storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If different float levels are assigned to different transaction machines, then specific machine demands are met, but replenishment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine-specific demand fulfillmentVSAvoidreplenishment management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling each transaction machine to effectively manage its own cash requirements through embedded monitoring and analysis capabilities. Each machine tracks its own transactions and payouts, generating localized data that informs its specific replenishment needs. This resolves the contradiction by allowing machines to self-determine their optimal float levels based on their unique patterns, reducing the complexity of centralized management while maintaining adaptability to individual demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If frequent collection and replenishment operations are performed, then cash levels are maintained, but operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecash level maintenanceVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by determining optimal replenishment timing based on analyzed transaction patterns. Rather than using fixed periodic schedules, the system identifies data-driven intervals that maintain adequate cash levels while minimizing operational frequency. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining reliability through pattern-based timing while improving productivity by eliminating unnecessary periodic interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3474243B1A transaction device and a method of currency item replenishment in a transaction device
Publication Date: 2022.04.20 INNOVATIVE TECH LTD
  • EP3474243B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3474243B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3474243B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A method and device for managing currency item replenishment in a transaction device (1) configured to accept a plurality m of currency item denominations, wherein the method comprises analysing transaction history data to produce statistics from which an optimum currency item replenishment period and currency item replenishment levels are determined.