Dynamic Checklist System for Real-Time Aviation Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current checklist systems are inefficient as they do not allow for real-time optimization and customization based on changing vehicle conditions, leading to unnecessary or detrimental actions, and lack communication with other systems for review and analysis.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic checklist system that continuously assesses vehicle conditions, generates customized checklists, and communicates status and information to onboard and back-office systems, enabling pilots to switch to new checklists as conditions change, and shares data for situational awareness and improved maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a checklist is completed before a new checklist can be generated, then checklist execution is sequential and controlled, but this results in inefficiencies and delays in situations requiring timely action

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechecklist execution efficiencyVSAvoidtime delay in checklist updates
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The checklist system dynamically generates new checklists based on changing vehicle conditions during execution, rather than requiring sequential completion. The system monitors conditions in real-time and automatically creates updated checklists when conditions change, allowing the checklist content to adapt dynamically without waiting for completion of previous items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary generation of updated checklists based on condition changes before the pilot needs to act. When conditions change during checklist execution, the system proactively generates the updated checklist in advance, notifies the pilot, and prepares the new checklist for immediate use, reducing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If a standardized checklist is used for all conditions, then checklist creation is simple and consistent, but the checklist may include unnecessary or detrimental items when conditions change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechecklist creation simplicityVSAvoidchecklist adaptability to changing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The checklist system applies local quality by customizing checklist items based on specific vehicle conditions. Rather than using a single standardized checklist for all situations, the system selectively includes or excludes items based on the actual condition of the vehicle, ensuring each checklist is optimized for the specific situation while maintaining ease of creation through automated rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes checklist parameters dynamically based on vehicle conditions. When conditions change during execution, the system modifies the checklist parameters (which items are included, their sequence, and their relevance) to reflect the current state, allowing the same checklist framework to adapt to different situations without manual recreation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If checklist information is not shared with other systems, then system complexity is reduced, but there is no communication of checklist status or information for review and analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integration complexityVSAvoidchecklist status communication
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The checklist system acts as an intermediary that communicates with other onboard and back-office systems. It shares checklist status, completion information, and vehicle condition data with maintenance systems, flight management systems, and ground-based operations centers, enabling information exchange without requiring deep integration of all systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9830564B2Customized automated checklist creation, execution and communication
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 THE BOEING CO
  • US9830564B2 patent drawing
  • US9830564B2 patent drawing
  • US9830564B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for creating, executing and communicating customized, automated checklists may include dynamically creating a customized checklist including a plurality of checklist items. The method may also include transmitting a notification to a predetermined recipient that the customized checklist is available. The method may additionally include displaying the customized checklist on an interface device in response to the customized checklist being selected by the recipient. The method may additionally include updating a status of each checklist item in response to each checklist item being completed. The method may further include determining if a new checklist is available during execution of an existing checklist and allowing a user to switch to the new checklist during the execution of the existing checklist.