Dynamic CMG Array Reorientation for Spacecraft Momentum Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spacecraft momentum control systems using control moment gyros (CMGs) face challenges in maintaining optimal momentum control when CMGs fail or when spacecraft mass properties change, leading to reduced control capabilities and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The system allows for the reorientation of CMGs around an axis not parallel to the gimbal axis, using a bearing between the CMG base and mount, with releasable clamps for rotation, and a controller that determines and implements new orientations to maximize momentum control space, either pre-launch or in-orbit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If CMGs are fixed in initial orientation, then manufacturing and installation are simplified, but momentum control space is reduced when mass properties change or CMGs fail

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCMG array installationVSAvoidmomentum control space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The CMG array transitions from a static fixed-orientation configuration to a dynamic reconfigurable system. Each CMG is equipped with a drive mechanism that enables rotation about an axis not parallel to the gimbal axis, allowing the array to adapt its orientation in response to CMG failures or changes in spacecraft mass properties, thereby maintaining optimal momentum control space throughout the mission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the orientation parameters of the CMGs dynamically. By rotating CMGs about a non-parallel axis, the array can alter its geometric configuration to compensate for mass property changes or failures, optimizing the momentum control space for different mission phases and conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If CMG array is designed for optimal initial orientation, then initial performance is maximized, but reliability decreases when CMGs fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial momentum control capabilityVSAvoidcontinued operation after failure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares for future failures by incorporating redundancy and adaptability into the CMG array design. The non-parallel rotation capability and reconfiguration algorithms are built in advance, allowing the array to maintain momentum control capability even after one or more CMGs fail, thus cushioning against the reliability degradation that would otherwise occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The CMG array becomes a dynamic system that can reconfigure its geometry in response to failures. By rotating remaining functional CMGs about non-parallel axes, the array maintains momentum control space and continues operation, transforming from a static vulnerable configuration to a dynamic resilient one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If CMGs are made reconfigurable with rotation capability, then adaptability to mass property changes is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemomentum control space optimizationVSAvoidCMG array mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The CMG array incorporates controlled dynamic elements (rotation mechanisms about non-parallel axes) that enable adaptability to mass property changes and failures. This dynamic capability allows the system to optimize momentum control space by reconfiguring CMG orientations in response to changing mission requirements and spacecraft conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of time

If CMG orientation is fixed at launch, then initial setup time is reduced, but in-orbit adaptability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial setup timeVSAvoidin-orbit reconfiguration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The CMG array is designed with dynamic reconfiguration capability that enables in-orbit adaptation. The non-parallel rotation mechanisms allow the array to adjust its orientation after launch, compensating for mass property changes and failures that occur during the mission, thus gaining in-orbit adaptability without sacrificing initial deployment simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the reliability and capability of spacecraft momentum control by compensating for CMG failures and changes in mass properties, ensuring optimal momentum control space is maintained, even after initial setup or changes.

Implementation Method 1

A bearing is desirably provided between the CMG base and mount to facilitate rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS7561947B2Dynamic CMG array and method
Publication Date: 2009.07.14 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US7561947B2 patent drawing
  • US7561947B2 patent drawing
  • US7561947B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus are provided for reorienting control moment gyros (CMGs) to compensate for CMG failure or change in spacecraft (S/C) mass properties or mission. An improved CMG comprises a drive means for rotating the CMG around an axis not parallel to the CMG gimbal axis. Releasable clamps lock the CMG to the spacecraft except during CMG array reorientation. CMGs arrays are combined with attitude sensors, a command module, memory for storing data and programs, CMG drivers and sensors (preferably for each CMG axis), and a controller coupling these elements. The method comprises determining whether a CMG has failed or the S/C properties or mission changed, identifying the working CMGs of the array, determining a new array reorientation for improved spacecraft control, unlocking, reorienting and relocking the CMGs in the array and updating the S/C control parameters for the new array orientation.