Dynamic Code Block Mapping Selection for Wireless Diversity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in code block mapping, as they often rely on fixed mapping types that may not adapt to the most beneficial diversity types (frequency, time, or spatial) for optimal throughput and reliability.

Innovation Solution

The system allows user equipment (UE) to transmit assistance information to a base station for dynamically selecting a mapping type from available options, such as frequency-first, time-first, or frequency-first-per-layer, based on channel metrics or previous allocations, enabling adaptive exploitation of different diversity types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fixed mapping type is used for code block mapping, then the system complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the adaptability to different diversity types (frequency, time, spatial) deteriorates and link efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic mapping type selection where the mapping type is no longer fixed but changes adaptively based on channel conditions. The base station determines the appropriate mapping type (frequency-first, time-first, or frequency-first-per-layer) based on received assistance information and current channel state, allowing the system to exploit different diversity types dynamically. This resolves the contradiction by making the system operational simple through automated selection while simultaneously achieving high adaptability to varying channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic mapping type selection is implemented, then the adaptability to different diversity types is improved and link efficiency is enhanced, but the device complexity and signaling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where the user equipment (UE) autonomously determines channel metrics and generates assistance information indicating the most beneficial mapping type. The UE performs channel measurements, evaluates which mapping type would be most effective for current conditions, and provides this recommendation to the base station. This reduces base station complexity by transferring the analytical burden to the UE, which has direct access to channel state information, while still achieving dynamic adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary action by having the UE pre-calculate and report assistance information about the most beneficial mapping type before actual data transmission. The UE performs channel measurements and mapping type evaluation in advance, providing the base station with a recommendation that simplifies the base station's decision-making process. This preliminary preparation reduces the real-time complexity at the base station while maintaining high adaptability in the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If assistance information is transmitted from UE to base station, then the mapping type selection accuracy is improved, but the signaling overhead and loss of time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for mapping type selection by having the UE generate compact assistance information that indicates the most beneficial mapping type. Rather than transmitting full channel state matrices or detailed measurement data, the UE processes channel measurements locally and extracts only the critical recommendation (which mapping type should be used). This extraction approach maintains high selection accuracy while significantly reducing signaling overhead and transmission time compared to sharing complete channel state information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12127183B2Dynamic and adaptive code block mapping selection
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12127183B2 patent drawing
  • US12127183B2 patent drawing
  • US12127183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. Generally, the described techniques provide for flexible selection of a type of mapping to use for mapping code blocks to a set of resources for transmission. A user equipment (UE) may transmit assistance information to a base station to assist the base station in selecting from a set of mapping types available for code block mapping. The UE may then receive, from the base station, an indication of a selected mapping type for code block mapping based on the assistance information. The assistance information may include a recommendation of a mapping type or a metric of a channel that the base station may use to select the mapping type. Because the mapping type may be selected dynamically (e.g., “on the fly”), the UE and the base station may be able to adaptively exploit different types of diversity.