Dynamic Contact Management System for Customer Service Centers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional customer service systems face inefficiencies in assigning customer contacts to appropriate agents and authorizing actions due to static and manual processes, leading to suboptimal resolution times and customer experiences.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic contact management system that uses machine learning models to generate scores based on agent and context data, empowering agents to perform actions beyond their default authorization levels for effective contact resolution without manual supervision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If static authorization levels and manual supervision are used, then security and control are maintained, but contact resolution time and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact resolution efficiencyVSAvoidauthorization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic authorization levels that automatically adjust based on real-time agent performance metrics, contact complexity, and contextual factors. Instead of static authorization tiers, the system continuously evaluates agent capability and grants temporary elevated authorization when appropriate, eliminating the need for manual supervision while maintaining security through automated risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the authorization parameter from fixed to variable by introducing a dynamic scoring model that evaluates multiple factors including agent performance history, contact type, customer risk profile, and issue complexity. This parameter transformation enables automated decision-making that adapts to each specific situation, resolving contacts faster without compromising control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If hierarchical authorization structures are maintained, then control and security are preserved, but agent autonomy and resolution speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagent autonomyVSAvoidauthorization hierarchy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables agents to self-authorize for elevated actions by automatically presenting their case to an AI evaluation system that assesses their capability and the contact's requirements. The system serves itself by making automated authorization decisions without human intervention, granting agents autonomy while maintaining security through objective, data-driven evaluation of agent performance and contact context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual hierarchical authorization system is replaced with an automated machine learning-based evaluation system. Instead of human supervisors reviewing and approving requests, an AI model processes agent performance data, contact information, and risk factors to make real-time authorization decisions, eliminating the mechanical complexity of manual approval workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If manual supervisor approval is required for elevated actions, then security is maintained, but contact resolution time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization securityVSAvoidcontact resolution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where agent actions, contact outcomes, and customer satisfaction metrics are fed back into the machine learning model. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from past decisions and improve its authorization accuracy over time, maintaining security through validated decision-making while enabling faster automated approvals as the system gains confidence in its predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of agent capability and contact requirements before authorization is needed. By pre-assessing agent performance metrics and contact complexity, the system prepares authorization decisions in advance, allowing for rapid approval when conditions are favorable without requiring real-time supervisor intervention, thus maintaining security while accelerating resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10264128B1Dynamic machine-learning-based contact processing
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10264128B1 patent drawing
  • US10264128B1 patent drawing
  • US10264128B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic contact management system is provided for managing customer contacts in a customer service center and dynamically determining which actions to take—or which actions are permitted to be taken—with respect to customer contacts. The system can process data regarding attributes of an agent or group of agents, and generate scores to use in making the dynamic determinations. Based on the scores, the system can temporarily authorize agents to perform actions that they would not otherwise be authorized to perform, assign customer contacts to agents who are most likely to resolve a contact in a satisfactory manner, generate dynamic comparisons of agents, and the like.