Dynamic Content Filtering via Iterative User Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multimedia content search techniques yield inconsistent results due to imprecise keyword queries, contextual relevance, and the influence of non-text content, leading to overwhelming amounts of irrelevant data amidst relevant information.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automatic customization of content filtering, which dynamically learns to distinguish relevant from irrelevant content through iterative user feedback, using feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and supervised classification to refine filters and improve search relevance over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If keyword search is used to search through big data sources, then search coverage is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to imprecise keyword queries and contextual relevance issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch coverageVSAvoidsearch accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where user interactions with search results (clicks, dwell time, scrolling behavior) are continuously collected and used to refine the relevance model. This feedback mechanism allows the system to improve measurement precision while maintaining broad search coverage through iterative learning from actual user behavior patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts search parameters including keyword weighting, contextual factor importance, and result ranking criteria based on learned user preferences and behavior patterns. This allows the system to optimize measurement precision for different query types and user contexts while preserving comprehensive search coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If conventional search filters are applied to reduce irrelevant results, then loss of information is reduced, but device complexity increases due to multiple filtering layers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation retentionVSAvoidfiltering system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a unified relevance model that simultaneously handles multiple filtering functions including keyword matching, contextual relevance assessment, user preference alignment, and result ranking. This multi-functional approach reduces device complexity by consolidating multiple filtering layers into a single integrated system that performs all filtering operations through one coherent framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically learns and adapts filtering criteria from user interactions without requiring manual configuration or complex rule-based filtering setups. The self-learning mechanism reduces device complexity by replacing manually configured multi-layer filters with an autonomous system that dynamically optimizes filtering based on observed user behavior patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic filter customization is implemented based on user feedback, then adaptability is improved, but loss of time increases due to continuous filter refinement processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter customization capabilityVSAvoidfilter refinement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial customization by applying filter refinement only to the most relevant aspects of user preferences based on interaction strength and recency. Rather than continuously refining all filter parameters, the system focuses computational resources on the most impactful customization decisions, reducing time loss while maintaining high adaptability for personalized search experiences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Manufacturing precision

If iterative feedback-driven customization is used to improve search relevance, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases due to multiple search iterations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result precisionVSAvoidsearch efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and analyzing user interaction patterns, pre-computing relevance weights, and pre-adjusting filter parameters based on initial feedback. This preliminary customization reduces the number of full iterative cycles needed, improving search result precision while minimizing the productivity loss associated with multiple search iterations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10482146B2Systems and methods for automatic customization of content filtering
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US10482146B2 patent drawing
  • US10482146B2 patent drawing
  • US10482146B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments include a system and method for Automatic Customization of Content Filtering (ACCF). The method includes receiving a search string from a user, creating a first filter based on the search string and searching different types of content stored in different content locations based on the first filter. The search returns a first subset of results to the user based on the first filter. The method further receives an indication of relevance for each one of the results in the first subset from the user. The method dynamically creates a second filter based on the received indications of relevance for the first subset of results. Based on the second filter, a second subset of more relevant results is returned to the user.