Dynamic Content Processing Settings for Quality Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content processing systems face challenges in determining optimal settings for content signals due to varying components in input and output devices, leading to potential overprocessing and degradation of content quality, especially when multiple devices apply the same processing types repeatedly.

Innovation Solution

A communications service system that receives characteristics of input and output devices to adjust processing components dynamically, using feedback from users and objective analysis to determine optimal settings, potentially employing machine learning to select settings based on historical data and user preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple devices apply the same processing types repeatedly to a content signal, then content quality improvement is attempted, but the content quality degrades due to overprocessing and digitization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent qualityVSAvoiddigitization and overprocessing degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where processing components analyze the output of previous processing stages and adjust their operation accordingly. This prevents redundant processing by detecting when a signal has already been processed and avoiding duplicate operations that would cause digitization degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The processing system dynamically adjusts the type and intensity of processing applied to content signals based on real-time analysis of the signal characteristics and the specific input-output device combination. This dynamic adaptation prevents static, repetitive processing that leads to overprocessing degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If processing settings are customized for different input and output hardware combinations, then content quality is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent qualityVSAvoidprocessing settings management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal processing framework that handles multiple input-output device combinations through a common architecture. By developing universal processing components that can adapt to different device types, the system achieves high content quality across various hardware combinations without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by parameterizing processing settings based on device characteristics rather than creating entirely separate processing chains for each device combination. This allows the same processing framework to be configured for different devices through parameter adjustment, maintaining quality while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If processing components are applied to improve content quality, then the quality may be enhanced, but redundant processing occurs when the same processing is applied multiple times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Processing components incorporate feedback mechanisms that track the processing history of content signals. This feedback allows the system to identify and eliminate redundant processing operations, ensuring that the same processing is not applied multiple times to the same signal, thus reducing processing time while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the content signal and the device combination before applying processing. This preliminary action identifies the necessary processing steps in advance, preventing redundant operations and optimizing the processing sequence to minimize processing time while ensuring quality improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11330228B1Perceived content quality through dynamic adjustment of processing settings
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11330228B1 patent drawing
  • US11330228B1 patent drawing
  • US11330228B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations for selecting processing settings based on a device characteristic are described. A content signal, such as an audio signal or a video signal, is received. A characteristic of an input device and/or an output device is then determined and one or more processing settings for processing the content signal are determined based on the characteristic of the input device and/or the output device. The content signal is then processed based on the one or more settings and the processed content signal is sent for output. Feedback regarding the quality of the processed content signal is received. If the quality of the processed content signal is unacceptable, then one or more of the signal processing settings can be changed by deactivating a setting or changing a parameter of a setting.