Dynamic Content Selection Filter for Ad Revenue Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Publishers face challenges in optimizing advertising revenue on parked domains due to the performance variability of keyword-based and default content selection processes in online advertising systems, making it difficult to choose the most effective selection method.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that evaluates the performance of content selected using keywords against a default/automatic selection process, determining whether to use the keywords or the default process for content selection, and periodically re-evaluating and reselecting the best-performing method based on monitored performance metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If keyword-based content selection is used, then advertising revenue may be improved, but performance variability increases making optimization difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising revenueVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between keyword-based and default content selection processes based on real-time performance evaluation. The evaluation engine continuously monitors metrics such as click-through rates and revenue, automatically determining which selection process performs better and adjusting the content selection strategy accordingly, transforming a static choice into a dynamic adaptive system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the evaluation engine monitors performance metrics of both keyword-based and default selection processes, compares their effectiveness, and uses this feedback to determine which process to utilize. This closed-loop control ensures the system continuously optimizes for advertising revenue while accounting for performance variability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If multiple content selection processes are evaluated and switched between, then advertising revenue is optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising revenueVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation engine serves as an intermediary component that manages the complexity of evaluating and switching between multiple content selection processes. It acts as a mediator that takes inputs from both keyword-based and default selection processes, evaluates their performance, and determines which process to utilize, centralizing the decision-making logic and simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9047621B1Content selection filter
Publication Date: 2015.06.02 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9047621B1 patent drawing
  • US9047621B1 patent drawing
  • US9047621B1 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more keywords associated with a domain are received. The performance of content selected based on the one or more keywords is evaluated against performance of content selected based on a automatic selection process. A determination is made based on the evaluation as to whether to utilize the automatic selection process or the one or more keywords for selecting content for the domain.