Dynamic Content Slot Assignment via Bidding Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for generating electronic communications are limited in flexibility and effectiveness, as they fail to adapt to changing market realities and consumer preferences, leading to reduced marketing efficiency and revenue for promotion and marketing services, merchants, and consumers.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that utilize content generators to dynamically select and assign content to slots within electronic communications based on selection parameters, bids, and analytic data, optimizing content placement and targeting through a scoring system and auction process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional methods are used for generating electronic communications, then the process is simple and straightforward, but the flexibility and effectiveness are limited, leading to reduced marketing efficiency and revenue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility and effectivenessVSAvoidcomplexity of content selection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the content selection process into multiple independent components: content generators create candidate content, bidding mechanisms evaluate content value, and assignment logic selects final content. This segmentation allows each component to specialize and improve flexibility without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic content selection where content generators, bids, and assignments are determined in real-time based on current parameters and conditions. This dynamic approach enables the system to adapt to changing market realities and consumer preferences, significantly improving flexibility and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If dynamic content selection with bidding and assignment is implemented, then targeting and revenue are improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarketing efficiency and revenueVSAvoidcomplexity of content generation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Content generators autonomously evaluate their own content and place bids based on predefined criteria and algorithms. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for manual content evaluation and assignment, improving marketing efficiency while containing system complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where analytic data from content performance informs future bidding and assignment decisions. This feedback mechanism continuously optimizes marketing efficiency and revenue without requiring proportional increases in system complexity, as the system learns and adapts automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If multiple content generators compete through bidding, then content quality and targeting precision improve, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetargeting precisionVSAvoidtime for content selection process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a bidding mechanism where content generators submit bids based on partial evaluation criteria, and the assignment logic selects content based on threshold bids rather than evaluating all possible combinations. This approach achieves high targeting precision without requiring exhaustive computation, thereby reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If analytic data is collected and used to update assignment preferences, then long-term marketing effectiveness improves, but the complexity of data processing and system coordination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarketing effectivenessVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where analytic data from content performance is continuously collected and used to update assignment preferences and bidding strategies. This feedback mechanism improves long-term marketing effectiveness by enabling the system to learn from past performance and optimize future content selection automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual content selection and evaluation processes with automated electronic bidding and assignment mechanisms. This substitution reduces the need for human intervention and simplifies data processing, improving reliability without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9684910B1Method and apparatus for generating an electronic communication
Publication Date: 2017.06.20 BYTEDANCE INC
  • US9684910B1 patent drawing
  • US9684910B1 patent drawing
  • US9684910B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus, and computer program product are disclosed to improve generation of electronic communications. The method may include providing a plurality of content slots each configured to receive content. The method may also include maintaining a database comprising a plurality of content generators, and determining, using a processor, one of the plurality of content generators for providing content to each of the plurality of content slots. The determining the one of the plurality of promotion content generators or non-promotion content generators may include providing a first content generator of the plurality of content generators with a set of selection parameters, and receiving a first bid for one of the plurality of content slots from the first content generator. The first content generator may determine the bid based at least in part on the set of selection parameters. The method may also include assigning the first content generator to the one of the plurality of content slots based on the bid.