Dynamic Conversational Response Timing Using Dual Neural Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing artificial intelligence systems face challenges in generating real-time dynamic conversational responses due to the complexity of obtaining high-quality data, the need for specialized knowledge to design and integrate AI solutions, and the obscurity of the results, which hinders error identification and improvement.

Innovation Solution

The use of two machine learning models: a first model trained on historic user intents and a second model trained on interaction-specific data, both utilizing neural networks to generate timely and pertinent responses, addressing the limitations of training data quality and bias by incorporating historic and real-time user interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional AI systems generate responses immediately upon user action, then response speed is improved, but conversational naturalness deteriorates due to lack of pauses and human-like timing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidconversational naturalness
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts response timing based on conversational context, user action types, and interaction history. Instead of fixed immediate responses, the system varies pause durations and response timing to match human conversational patterns, making the bot's responses feel more natural while maintaining speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes temporal parameters (response delay, pause duration, interaction rhythm) based on the current conversational state. By modifying these timing parameters dynamically, the system achieves both speed and naturalness, avoiding the trade-off between quick responses and human-like behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If machine learning models are trained on limited training data, then system complexity is reduced, but intent recognition accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data requirementsVSAvoidintent recognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary feature extraction and intent classification in real-time during user interactions. By continuously learning from actual usage patterns and updating models incrementally, the system achieves high accuracy without requiring extensive pre-trained data, reducing the complexity of data collection and preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system improves its own accuracy through self-learning from user interactions. It automatically adjusts its intent recognition based on real-time feedback and interaction patterns, eliminating the need for large external training datasets while maintaining high accuracy through continuous self-improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If AI systems process multiple user actions simultaneously, then productivity is improved, but error rate increases due to lack of contextual attention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the processing of multiple user actions into distinct contextual windows. It analyzes actions individually within their specific temporal and contextual frames, then integrates the results. This segmentation allows parallel processing for productivity while maintaining contextual attention for reliability, reducing errors through focused analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary contextual analysis for each user action before processing. By pre-establishing the context and intent for each action, the system can process multiple actions simultaneously without compromising accuracy, as each action is already framed within its proper contextual understanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12190068B2Systems and methods for generating real-time dynamic conversational responses during conversational interactions using machine learning models
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12190068B2 patent drawing
  • US12190068B2 patent drawing
  • US12190068B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are presented for generating real-time dynamic conversational responses during conversational interactions using machine learning models based on historic intents for a plurality of users and user-specific interactions. The machine learning models comprise a neural network trained to select a first intent from a plurality of intents based on historic data accumulated prior to the conversational interaction and a neural network trained to select a first interaction-specific intent from a plurality of interaction-specific intents based on interaction-specific data for a user.