Dynamic Core Cooling via Power State Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cooling systems in multi-core computer systems are inefficient as they uniformly cool the entire processor die, failing to account for varying power states of individual cores, leading to thermal energy imbalances and increased power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that includes a microprocessor with output terminals indicating the power management state of each core, allowing for dynamic adjustment of cooling resources such as heatsinks, fans, liquid cooling, or Peltier devices to focus on active cores, thereby optimizing thermal energy removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If uniform cooling is applied to the entire processor die, then cooling coverage is complete, but cooling efficiency is reduced and power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling power consumptionVSAvoidthermal energy removal capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor die is divided into multiple thermal zones corresponding to individual cores or core groups, with independent temperature sensors and cooling control for each zone. This segmentation enables selective cooling of only those regions that require it, eliminating the energy waste of uniformly cooling the entire die while maintaining effective thermal management of active cores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different cooling strategies and intensities are applied to different regions of the processor die based on local thermal conditions and core power states. Active cores receive enhanced cooling while inactive or low-power cores receive reduced cooling, optimizing the balance between thermal energy removal and power consumption at each local region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If cooling resources are concentrated on active cores, then cooling efficiency is improved, but thermal energy removal capability may be insufficient for high power states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling power consumptionVSAvoidprocessor thermal energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system dynamically adjusts its operation based on real-time monitoring of core power states and temperature conditions. When cores transition to high-power states, the cooling system automatically increases cooling capacity for those specific regions. This dynamic adaptation ensures adequate thermal energy removal capability is maintained while avoiding the continuous power consumption of static maximum-cooling configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Temperature sensors provide continuous feedback on the thermal state of each core or core group, which is used to adjust cooling resources in real-time. This feedback mechanism ensures that cooling capacity is scaled appropriately to match the actual thermal energy generation, preventing both overheating of active cores and unnecessary cooling of inactive regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If monolithic cooling devices cover the entire processor package, then manufacturing is simplified, but adaptability to varying core power states is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to core power statesVSAvoidcooling system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monolithic cooling device is segmented into multiple independently controllable cooling elements or zones, each capable of being adjusted separately. This segmentation maintains the compact integrated structure beneficial for manufacturing while enabling flexible adaptation to varying power states of different cores through independent control of each cooling zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances cooling efficiency by directing thermal resources to active cores, reducing power draw and enabling increased processing capability within the same thermal design power budget, while improving battery life in mobile devices and reducing active cooling power consumption in servers.

Implementation Method 1

cooling devices such as a fan are used to cool the microprocessor during operation by blowing air over a heatsink thermally coupled to the processor integrated circuit, thereby removing heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

blowing air over a heatsink thermally coupled to the processor integrated circuit, thereby removing heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

heatsinks and fans, liquid cooling, or Peltier devices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPeltier effect: Peltier Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8665592B2Heat management using power management information
Publication Date: 2014.03.04 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US8665592B2 patent drawing
  • US8665592B2 patent drawing
  • US8665592B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-core microprocessor provides an indication of the power management state of each of the cores on output terminals. Cooling of the cores is adjusted responsive to the indication of the power management state of the respective cores with additional cooling being provided to those cores in a more active state and less cooling provided to those cores in a less active state.