Dynamic Creasing Mechanism for Flexible Sheets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional creasing machines are either too slow for small production runs or require custom dies, leading to inefficiencies and damage to printed documents, especially with modern ink or toner-based systems, and are not suitable for all creasing applications.

Innovation Solution

A creasing machine with a mechanism featuring first and second creasing members that move in the direction of sheet movement, driven by a system matching their speed to the sheet's speed, allowing for dynamic creasing while the sheet is in motion, and a control system that adjusts speeds for optimal crease placement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional platen presses or hand-operated machines are used for creasing, then creases can be formed in documents, but the machine speed is very slow and unsuitable for production runs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecreasing speedVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the creasing members movable rather than stationary. The first and second creasing members move in the direction of sheet movement, with at least one member being moveable towards the other to produce creases. This dynamic arrangement allows the machine to operate at higher speeds while maintaining effective creasing, resolving the contradiction between creasing quality and production speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If platen presses with custom creasing dies are used, then creasing can be performed, but custom dies are required for each application making the system complex and suitable only for large production runs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecreasing application flexibilityVSAvoidcustom die requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality through creasing members with adjustable positioning and configuration. The members can be positioned at different locations and adjusted to accommodate various creasing applications without requiring custom dies for each task. This universal design allows a single machine to handle multiple creasing scenarios, eliminating the need for complex custom tooling while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic positioning capability of the creasing members allows them to be adjusted to different locations and orientations as needed. This dynamic adjustability provides versatility for different creasing applications without requiring separate custom dies, reducing device complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If conventional creasing methods are used on documents with modern ink or toner-based printing, then creases can be formed, but cracking of the printed surface occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecreasing operation capabilityVSAvoidprinted surface cracking
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic movement of the creasing members in the direction of sheet travel allows for controlled, progressive crease formation. This dynamic approach distributes the creasing force over time and space, reducing peak stresses that cause cracking in printed surfaces. The motion-based creasing is gentler than static pressing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the creasing operation by introducing motion variables - the speed, position, and timing of the creasing members. By controlling these parameters, the creasing force is applied more gradually and uniformly, preventing the sudden stress concentrations that cause ink and toner cracking while still achieving effective creases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If paper is made static during creasing operation to form creases, then creases can be formed without tearing, but the machine throughput is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrease formation qualityVSAvoidmachine throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by making the creasing members dynamic rather than requiring the paper to be static. The members move with the paper and apply creasing force during motion, achieving both reliable crease formation and continuous paper feed. This eliminates the need to stop the paper for each creasing operation, maintaining high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous movement of the paper through the machine while creasing members apply force during motion enables uninterrupted operation. The useful action of creasing continues without interruption as paper passes through, maintaining continuous throughput while ensuring quality creases are formed through controlled dynamic force application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS9259892B2Creasing machine
Publication Date: 2016.02.16 MORGANA SYST
  • US9259892B2 patent drawing
  • US9259892B2 patent drawing
  • US9259892B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A creasing machine (1) for forming creases in sheets (11) of flexible material, said creasing machine (1) including a creasing mechanism (5), a transport mechanism (3) for transporting sheets (11) of material through the creasing mechanism, and a control means (7) for controlling operation of the creasing mechanism (5) and the transport mechanism (3), said creasing mechanism (3) including first and second creasing members (25,27) and a drive mechanism (28) for driving the creasing members (25,27), wherein the creasing members (25,27) are arranged to move in the direction of movement of the sheet (11) and at least one of said creasing members (25,27) is moveable towards the other creasing member (25,27) to produce a crease in a sheet (11) located between those members (25,27), and wherein the control means (7) is arranged to substantially match the speed of movement of the creasing members (25,27) with the speed of the sheet to enable the sheet to be creased while moving.