Dynamic Credential Verification Using Alternate Trustees

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of verifying the authenticity of electronic documents is hindered when the entity that issued the credential becomes unavailable over time, leading to untrusted and useless credentials.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that dynamically verifies the authenticity of credentials by determining current trustees, assessing their trustworthiness, and using alternate trustees as necessary to confirm the credential's authenticity at the point of use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If credentials are verified statically from originally issued credentials, then verification simplicity is maintained, but reliability deteriorates when the issuing entity becomes unavailable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredential authenticity verificationVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing a network of alternate trustees and pre-configuring credential structures with multiple trust paths before the issuing entity becomes unavailable. This ensures verification can proceed without real-time interaction with the original issuer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Alternate trustees act as intermediaries between the credential holder and the verifying entity. When the original issuing entity is unavailable, these intermediary trustees can validate credential authenticity, maintaining verification reliability without requiring direct access to the original issuer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If credentials remain valid indefinitely from original issuance, then ease of use is improved, but security deteriorates due to increased risk of tampering over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredential securityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The credential verification system transitions from static verification to dynamic verification. The system can adaptively select among multiple trustees based on current trust assessments, and the verification process can be adjusted in real-time based on the credential's age, type, and risk profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes verification parameters dynamically based on credential characteristics. For example, newer credentials may require fewer verification steps while older credentials trigger more rigorous multi-trustee verification, optimizing both security and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple alternate trustees are implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification robustnessVSAvoidtrustee management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The credential data structure is designed with universal multi-functionality to accommodate multiple trustees. The same credential format supports both single-trustee and multi-trustee verification scenarios, allowing the system to scale reliability without requiring fundamentally different credential structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250141691A1Dynamically verifying authenticity and validity of credentials
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250141691A1 patent drawing
  • US20250141691A1 patent drawing
  • US20250141691A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method, according to one embodiment, includes: receiving a request to verify authenticity of a credential that indicates that an associated holder has a set of certified attributes. In response to determining that the credential has not been compromised, current trustees that are associated with the credential are determined. Additionally, a determination is made as to whether the current trustees are trusted. In response to determining that one or more of the current trustees are not trusted, alternate trustees of the credential are determined. Moreover, these alternate trustees are used as updated current trustees to confirm authenticity of the credential.