Dynamic Credit Scheduler for Network Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional credit-based schedulers in networks lack an effective method to dynamically adjust credit sizes, leading to inefficiencies in bandwidth allocation and increased latency and jitter, especially in real-time applications like voice and video transmissions.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves dynamically adjusting credit sizes based on a weighted moving average of incoming packet sizes, ensuring that the average credit size equals the moving average incoming packet size of the entire scheduler, which can be calculated using simple or weighted moving averages, and prioritizing queues to optimize bandwidth allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fixed credit sizes are used in credit-based schedulers, then bandwidth allocation is simplified, but latency and jitter increase due to inability to adapt to traffic burstiness and packet size variation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth allocation simplicityVSAvoidlatency and jitter
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic credit adjustment by calculating a moving average of incoming packet sizes and using this to continuously update credit values. The credit for each queue is adjusted based on the formula: credit = moving_average_packet_size × queue_weight, allowing the scheduler to adapt to changing traffic patterns in real-time, thereby reducing latency and jitter while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by monitoring incoming packet sizes and using this information to adjust credit allocations. The moving average calculation provides continuous feedback about traffic characteristics, which is then used to optimize bandwidth allocation dynamically, resolving the contradiction between simple operation and performance optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If credit sizes are dynamically adjusted based on moving average packet size, then latency and jitter are reduced, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatency and jitterVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by updating credits only based on the moving average of packet sizes rather than analyzing every individual packet characteristic. This selective approach captures the essential traffic patterns needed for optimization while avoiding the computational overhead of complete traffic analysis, thus reducing latency and jitter without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the credit parameter dynamically based on observed packet size patterns. By adjusting this single critical parameter based on moving average calculations, the system achieves performance optimization without implementing complex multi-parameter control mechanisms, balancing improved latency/jitter with manageable computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If round robin scheduler serves each queue in turn without considering packet size, then implementation is simple, but bandwidth allocation is unfair to sources sending long packets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduler implementation simplicityVSAvoidbandwidth allocation fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different credit values to different queues based on their specific traffic characteristics and priority requirements. Instead of uniform treatment, each queue receives customized credit allocation proportional to its needs, achieving fair bandwidth distribution while maintaining the simplicity of round-robin servicing through the formula: credit_i = moving_average_packet_size × weight_i

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple queues are maintained for different service classes, then quality of service differentiation is achieved, but scheduling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of service differentiationVSAvoidscheduling algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves QoS differentiation across multiple queues using a universal credit-based round-robin mechanism. The same basic scheduling algorithm serves all queues, with the only variation being the credit value assigned to each queue based on its service class. This universal approach provides versatile QoS support without requiring complex queue-specific scheduling logic for each service class

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9042398B2Dynamically adjusted credit based round robin scheduler
Publication Date: 2015.05.26 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP INC
  • US9042398B2 patent drawing
  • US9042398B2 patent drawing
  • US9042398B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A credit based queue scheduler dynamically adjusts credits depending upon at least a moving average of incoming packet size to alleviate the impact of traffic burstiness and packet size variation, and increase the performance of the scheduler by lowering latency and jitter. For the case when no service differentiation is required, the credit is adjusted by computing a weighted moving average of incoming packets for the entire scheduler. For the case when differentiation is required, the credit for each queue is determined by a product of a sum of credits given to all queues and priority levels of each queue.