Personalized Recommendation System Using Dynamic Customer Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current product recommendation systems in e-commerce fail to effectively personalize recommendations for individual customers, leading to lower purchase effectiveness due to the assumption that customers with similar purchase behavior patterns have identical preferences, resulting in inadequate product recommendations for customers with unique patterns.

Innovation Solution

A personalized recommendation system that employs a combination of single recommendation algorithms, such as collaborative filtering, association rule, and purchase pattern algorithms, along with a hybrid approach, to analyze and prioritize product recommendations based on performance evaluations, ensuring higher hit rates by selectively collecting and processing relevant customer data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If collaborative filtering algorithm is used to recommend products based on similar purchase behavior patterns, then recommendation coverage is improved, but recommendation precision for customers with unique patterns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation coverageVSAvoidrecommendation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments customers into different groups based on their purchase behavior patterns (e.g., impulse buyers, planned buyers, browse-and-buy customers). Different recommendation algorithms are then applied to different customer segments: collaborative filtering for customers with similar patterns and alternative algorithms for customers with unique patterns. This segmentation allows the system to maintain broad coverage while improving precision for each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the recommendation approach based on real-time analysis of customer purchase behavior patterns. When a customer's behavior deviates from expected patterns, the system switches from collaborative filtering to alternative algorithms. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to maintain both coverage and precision by responding to individual customer needs as they evolve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If product recommendations are made en bloc to every customer without considering individual preferences, then system complexity is reduced, but purchase effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidpurchase effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic classification of customers into segments based on their purchase behavior patterns. This dynamic segmentation allows the system to maintain relative simplicity while significantly improving purchase effectiveness. By automatically classifying customers and applying appropriate algorithms, the system achieves personalization without requiring complex manual configuration for each customer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of customer classification and algorithm selection based on observed purchase behavior patterns. The system monitors various parameters (purchase frequency, basket composition, timing patterns) and adjusts the recommendation strategy accordingly. This parameter-based approach enables the system to balance complexity and effectiveness by using measurable customer characteristics to guide algorithm selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If collaborative filtering assumes customers with similar patterns have identical preferences, then algorithm simplicity is maintained, but recommendation accuracy for diverse customers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm simplicityVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments customers into distinct groups based on their purchase behavior patterns, allowing each segment to be handled with appropriate algorithms. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by maintaining simplicity within homogeneous segments (where CF works well) while applying more sophisticated algorithms to heterogeneous segments, thereby improving overall accuracy without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple recommendation algorithms into a unified framework that can handle different customer types. By combining collaborative filtering with alternative algorithms (such as content-based filtering or association rules) and merging their outputs through a coordinated selection mechanism, the system achieves high accuracy for diverse customers while maintaining a cohesive, manageable algorithm structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10789634B2Personalized recommendation method and system, and computer-readable record medium
Publication Date: 2020.09.29 LG CNS CO LTD
  • US10789634B2 patent drawing
  • US10789634B2 patent drawing
  • US10789634B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method, system, and a computer-readable record medium for providing a personalized recommendation of products. The method of providing a personalized recommendation of products may include obtaining a first recommendation result using each of two or more single recommendation algorithms, performing a first performance evaluation, using a processor, with respect to the first recommendation result from each of the single recommendation algorithms, obtaining a second recommendation result based on the first recommendation result from each of the two or more single recommendation algorithms using a hybrid recommendation algorithm, the hybrid recommendation algorithms being different than each of the two or more single recommendation algorithms, performing a second performance evaluation, using the processor, with respect to the second recommendation result from the hybrid recommendation algorithm, and listing product recommendations after selecting a recommendation algorithm having a priority using the first performance evaluation and the second performance evaluation.