Dynamic Data Structure Switching for Cache Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Selecting an optimal data structure for storage and retrieval systems is challenging due to difficulties in predicting usage patterns and access frequencies, often resulting in suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dynamic switching mechanism that monitors usage statistics and adjusts the internal data structure to optimize performance by comparing the costs of different data structures and switching between them as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a fixed data structure is selected for storage and retrieval systems, then the system implementation is simple, but the performance may be suboptimal when usage patterns differ from expectations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementation simplicityVSAvoidstorage and retrieval performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic data structure selection where the system automatically switches between different data structures (e.g., hash tables, trees, lists) based on monitored usage patterns. The system collects statistics on access frequencies and switching costs, then adapts its internal data structure to match actual usage behavior, transforming a static system into a dynamic one that optimizes performance in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of data structure type based on usage conditions. By monitoring access patterns and switching costs, the system adjusts which data structure is active (e.g., transitioning from a hash table to a tree structure when access patterns indicate sorted retrieval is more efficient), thereby optimizing performance for the current operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If multiple data structures are maintained to handle different usage patterns, then performance optimization is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage and retrieval performanceVSAvoiddata structure management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically monitoring its own usage patterns, collecting statistics on access frequencies and switching costs, and making informed decisions about which data structure to use. This eliminates the need for external manual tuning or complex configuration mechanisms, allowing the system to manage its own performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where usage statistics are continuously collected and fed back into the system's decision-making process. The system compares actual usage patterns against expected patterns and adjusts its data structure selection accordingly, creating a closed-loop optimization system that learns from its own operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If manual optimization of data structures is performed, then performance can be tuned for specific conditions, but the time and resources required for optimization increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage and retrieval performanceVSAvoidoptimization time and resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs optimization without requiring manual intervention. It collects usage statistics, analyzes access patterns, and makes informed decisions about data structure selection autonomously, eliminating the need for developers to manually tune performance parameters or conduct extensive benchmarking during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of usage patterns and proactively switches to optimal data structures before performance degradation occurs. By continuously monitoring and predicting usage trends, the system can preemptively adjust its configuration rather than reacting to performance issues after they arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7469300B2System and method for storage and retrieval of arbitrary content and application data
Publication Date: 2008.12.23 ADEIA MEDIA HOLDINGS INC
  • US7469300B2 patent drawing
  • US7469300B2 patent drawing
  • US7469300B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for improving the performance of a data storage and retrieval system by enabling dynamic switching from one internal data structure to another in response to detecting conditions indicating that a switch would improve performance. In one embodiment, a network proxy implements a cache using a first internal data structure. The caches objects comprise Web pages, and the cache keys comprise URLs corresponding to the Web pages. The proxy monitors cache usage and periodically determines costs associated with usage of the first data structure and an alternative data structure. If the costs associated with the alternative data structure are less than the costs associated with the first data structure, the proxy crates the alternative data structure, migrates data from the first data structure to the alternative data structure, begins using the alternative data structure for the cache, and deletes the first data structure.