Dynamic Declarative Interfaces for Unified Real-Time Form Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interface design applications limit user interactivity during the design process, often requiring separate 'preview' and 'develop' modes, and fail to provide drag-and-drop interface design or binding user interface elements to data sources, making it difficult for non-programmers to create interactive and functional electronic forms.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows users to design, develop, and test electronic forms in real-time, maintaining associations between components and program logic, enabling drag-and-drop functionality and automatic translation of user interactions into programmatic changes without coding, ensuring seamless integration of design and functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If separate preview and develop modes are used, then application functionality is organized into discrete experiences, but user interactivity is limited during the design process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interactivity during designVSAvoidinterface structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the previously separate preview and develop modes into a single unified interface. Users can now interact with and test electronic forms in real-time during the design process without switching between discrete modes. The system maintains the ability to provide both design functionality and interactive testing within the same interface environment, eliminating the need for mode switching while preserving the organizational benefits of having distinct functional areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If drag-and-drop interface design is implemented, then non-programmers can easily modify user interfaces, but the system must maintain complex associations between components and program logic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface design capabilityVSAvoidcomponent associations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service mechanisms that automatically manage the complex associations between drag-and-drop components and program logic. When users add, move, or configure components through drag-and-drop operations, the system automatically generates, updates, and maintains the corresponding program logic and component associations without requiring user intervention. This automated bookkeeping handles the complexity internally while keeping the user interface simple and accessible to non-programmers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer that sits between the visual drag-and-drop interface and the underlying program logic. This intermediary automatically translates visual component arrangements into programmatic associations, managing the complexity of maintaining relationships between components, data sources, and logic. Users interact with the simple visual interface while the intermediary handles the complex translation and association maintenance in the background.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If real-time testing is enabled during design, then users can test functionality immediately, but the system must preserve interactivity while maintaining component associations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign iteration speedVSAvoidcomponent associations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback mechanisms that monitor and maintain component associations in real-time during testing. When users interact with the electronic form during design, the system provides immediate feedback on functionality while simultaneously updating and preserving all underlying component associations, data source connections, and program logic relationships. This real-time feedback loop ensures that interactivity is maintained without compromising the integrity of component associations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the system dynamic by allowing component associations and program logic to be continuously updated and reconfigured during real-time testing. The system can adapt to user actions, add or modify components on-the-fly, and maintain all associations dynamically without requiring a compilation or deployment step. This dynamic approach enables rapid design iteration while preserving the reliability of component relationships through automated management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250306749A1Intelligent manipulation of dynamic declarative interfaces
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 APPIAN CORP
  • US20250306749A1 patent drawing
  • US20250306749A1 patent drawing
  • US20250306749A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques that provide improvements to designer applications as described to address, for example, limitations associated with constructing a user interface as it is being designed by a user in a development environment. In some implementations, a system provides a design interface through which a user can view, develop, and test functional aspects of an electronic form in real-time while the user is building the application. The system maintains associations between components of the electronic form and expressions for the components referenced in program logic for the electronic form.