Dynamic Delivery Routing Using Vehicle Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current delivery systems face challenges in densely populated cities with traffic laws restricting large commercial vehicles during peak hours, leading to delayed or undelivered perishable goods.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that proactively transfers packages to smaller vehicles or on-demand warehouses, analyzing contextual situations to identify suitable vehicles and routes, ensuring timely delivery by utilizing machine learning and logistics optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If large commercial vehicles are used for delivery, then transportation capacity and efficiency are improved, but traffic restrictions during peak hours prevent timely delivery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery efficiencyVSAvoidability to navigate traffic restrictions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The delivery system is segmented into multiple vehicle types with different capabilities. Large vehicles handle non-urgent deliveries while smaller vehicles handle time-sensitive deliveries in restricted areas. The system divides the delivery fleet into hierarchical levels based on vehicle size and access permissions, allowing simultaneous operation of multiple delivery streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects vehicle types and routes based on real-time conditions including traffic restrictions, delivery priority, and package characteristics. Routing decisions are not static but adapt continuously to changing urban conditions, allowing the system to switch between large and small vehicles depending on current constraints and delivery requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If packages are transferred between multiple vehicles, then delivery timeliness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery timeVSAvoidvehicle coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A centralized route optimization system acts as an intermediary that coordinates all vehicle transfers and route changes. This mediator processes delivery requests, determines optimal transfer points, and manages the handoff between different vehicle types. The complexity is centralized in the control system rather than distributed across individual vehicles, simplifying on-vehicle operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates optimal transfer points and routes before deliveries begin. By determining in advance where and when vehicle transfers will occur, the system minimizes on-the-fly decision-making and reduces actual transfer time. Routes are planned considering all constraints upfront, allowing smooth execution during actual deliveries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If smaller vehicles are used to bypass restrictions, then access to restricted areas is improved, but transportation capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to restricted areasVSAvoidpackage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Deliveries are segmented by priority level and destination characteristics. High-priority or time-sensitive packages are routed through smaller vehicles that can access restricted areas, while lower-priority packages continue on large vehicles. This segmentation allows the system to optimize each package's route based on its specific requirements rather than using a single vehicle type for all deliveries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The delivery system is designed to be universal, handling both restricted and non-restricted area deliveries through a single integrated platform. The system can dynamically assign different vehicle types to different packages based on destination requirements, making the overall system adaptable to multiple delivery scenarios without requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11922360B2Managing delivery by utilizing multiple vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11922360B2 patent drawing
  • US11922360B2 patent drawing
  • US11922360B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach for managing delivery of packages utilizing one or more vehicles is disclosed. The approach includes loading delivery vehicles in a such a way that, based on contextual need of offloading of the packages from the delivery vehicles, the approach will selectively offload the packages from the delivery vehicle to on-demand warehouse as service location along the route of the delivery vehicle. The delivery vehicles can proactively analyze various contextual situation, and can identify which and how much products are to be off-loaded from the delivery vehicles, and can proactively book warehouse as a service location along with the route of the delivery vehicle so that the products can be transferred from a transportation vehicle to on-demand warehouse as a service location effectively and efficiently.