Dynamic Email Recipient Grouping via Content Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing email applications are restrictive in how recipients can be selected and grouped, requiring users to either enter each recipient manually or select from preformed groups, which is time-consuming and prone to errors, and do not allow for dynamic grouping based on user-specific email content or relationships.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that dynamically groups email recipients by analyzing previous emails to discover associations based on content, keywords, and patterns, suggesting associated recipients and allowing users to create groups dynamically, with the ability to modify and refine these associations over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If users manually select or expand predefined recipient groups, then email can be sent to multiple recipients, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemail sending speedVSAvoidtime to manage recipients
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies and suggests recipient groups based on the email content, subject line, and previously sent emails. The recipient group selection is performed autonomously by the system without requiring manual user input for each recipient, thereby reducing time loss and improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-identifies and pre-sorts potential recipient groups before the user needs to send the email. By analyzing past communication patterns and email content in advance, the system prepares suggested recipient groups that can be quickly selected or modified, eliminating the need for manual scanning and selection during email composition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If users manually add or eliminate recipients from groups, then precise recipient selection is achieved, but the process is repetitive and cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient selection accuracyVSAvoidease of recipient management
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously learns from user feedback by observing which suggested recipient groups are accepted or modified. This feedback loop allows the system to refine its recipient group identification algorithms over time, improving accuracy while reducing the need for manual adjustment. Users provide implicit feedback through their selection behavior, which the system uses to optimize future suggestions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters for recipient group identification by analyzing different aspects of email content such as subject lines, body text, attachments, and communication history. By dynamically adjusting these analysis parameters based on the specific email context, the system achieves precise recipient selection without requiring manual recipient management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If predefined recipient groups are used, then email distribution is simplified, but the groups are too broad and include unwanted recipients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of email distributionVSAvoidrecipient targeting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using uniform predefined groups, the system creates localized recipient suggestions based on the specific characteristics of each email. By analyzing the content, subject line, and context of each individual email, the system identifies which recipient subgroups are most relevant, providing precise targeting while maintaining ease of operation through automated selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If users create custom recipient groups, then precise targeting is achieved, but the process is repetitive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient targeting precisionVSAvoidemail composition efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs the recipient group creation and selection process autonomously by analyzing email content and communication history. Instead of requiring users to manually create and manage custom groups, the system self-services the recipient identification task, achieving precise targeting while significantly improving email composition efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual recipient selection and group creation with automated content-based analysis. By substituting manual operations with algorithmic analysis of email content, subject lines, and communication patterns, the system achieves precise recipient targeting without the repetitive mechanical effort of manual group management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9245238B2Dynamic grouping of email recipients
Publication Date: 2016.01.26 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9245238B2 patent drawing
  • US9245238B2 patent drawing
  • US9245238B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, and computer usable program product for dynamic grouping of email recipients are provided in the illustrative embodiments. A first recipient and a second recipient of a first email are identified and an association is formed between them. A selection of the first recipient is detected in a second email. Using the association, the second recipient is suggested as a recipient of the second email. The first email may be a previously sent email, and the second email may be an email being composed. A characteristic of the first email is identified and the characteristic may be used as a basis for the association in forming the association. The characteristic may be a phrase in, a type of content in, an attachment in, or a periodicity of the first email. Strength of the association may be modified based on the third email.