Dynamic Encryption Algorithm Selection for Edge Data Security
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing technologies face challenges in securely transmitting data between edge devices, as the encryption mechanisms used can be compromised by third parties, leading to potential data breaches.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a security framework that dynamically selects an encryption algorithm based on attributes such as the identifiers of the sending and receiving edge devices, data classification, and progressive rules that change over time, thereby enhancing data security.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a fixed encryption algorithm is used for data transmission, then the encryption process is simple and fast, but the security is compromised as third parties can determine and potentially break the encryption
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic selection of encryption algorithms based on multiple attributes including data classification, sender/receiver identifiers, and progressive rules that change over time. This transforms the static encryption approach into a dynamic one where the encryption algorithm is selected from a pool of available algorithms based on current conditions, thereby enhancing security without requiring a single complex fixed mechanism
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes the parameters of the encryption mechanism by selecting different algorithms (symmetric, asymmetric, hash-based) based on data sensitivity classification and progressive rules. The encryption approach is transformed from a fixed parameter to a variable parameter that adapts to different security requirements, time periods, and data types
2Reliability
If dynamic encryption algorithm selection is implemented based on multiple attributes and progressive rules, then data security is enhanced, but the complexity of the encryption mechanism increases
Solution Approach 1:
The encryption system operates autonomously by automatically selecting the appropriate encryption algorithm based on the attributes of the data and communication partners. The progressive rules engine self-evaluates multiple conditions and determines the encryption approach without manual intervention, making the complex security mechanism transparent to users while maintaining operational simplicity
Solution Approach 2:
The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the classification of data, identifiers of communicating parties, and progressive rules collectively determine the encryption algorithm selection. This feedback loop ensures that the encryption mechanism adapts to security requirements while maintaining ease of operation through automated decision-making
3Reliability
If progressive rules changing over time are used to select encryption algorithms, then it becomes harder for third parties to determine the encryption algorithm, but the system requires more complex rule management
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements progressive rules that change over time periods, where different encryption algorithms are selected based on temporal factors. This periodic variation in encryption selection makes it difficult for third parties to predict or determine the encryption algorithm being used, as the selection criteria evolve over time rather than remaining static
Data Source
AI summary
Methods and systems for securing data are disclosed. The data may be secured by encrypting the data. The data may be sent from one edge device to another edge device. To secure the transmission of the data between edge devices, the selection of an encryption algorithm to encrypt the data may be based on progressive rules and other attributes. The progressive rules may be determined by an edge orchestrator and send to all edge devices. The other attributes may include identifiers of the one edge device and the other edge device and classification of the data.