Dynamic Encryption System Using Evolving Multidimensional Tables

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current encryption methods are vulnerable to attacks due to static encryption keys and lack of scalability, and existing software solutions fail to effectively secure software applications and intellectual property from piracy and tampering.

Innovation Solution

A secure endpoint token management system that employs dynamic and random encryption, using a multidimensional table that evolves with each use, and incorporates a virtual operating environment for secure data transmission and software integrity protection, allowing for secure access to information and continuous security updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static encryption keys are used, then encryption implementation is simple, but security is vulnerable to attacks over time

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveencryption implementation complexityVSAvoidsecurity reliability

Core Design Contradiction:

Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic encryption by continuously changing encryption keys and algorithms during data transmission and storage. The system generates new encryption parameters on-the-fly rather than relying on static keys, making the encryption adaptive and resistant to long-term attacks while maintaining implementation feasibility through automated key management.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes encryption parameters including keys, algorithms, and initialization vectors during operation. This parameter variability ensures that even if one encryption scheme is compromised, the system can switch to different parameters, maintaining security reliability without requiring complex manual key management.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If encryption complexity is increased to thwart attacks, then security strength improves, but processing performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvesecurity strengthVSAvoidprocessing performance

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic changes in encryption complexity, using stronger algorithms at critical points (key generation, initial encryption) and optimized algorithms for high-volume data processing. This periodic variation maintains security strength while preserving processing performance during bulk operations.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The encryption process is segmented into different stages with varying complexity levels. Critical data segments use high-strength encryption, while less sensitive segments use optimized algorithms. This segmentation allows the system to achieve overall security strength without uniformly sacrificing processing performance across all data.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If multiple encryption keys are used to strengthen security, then encryption strength improves, but key management complexity and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveencryption strengthVSAvoidkey management complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service key management where encryption keys are automatically generated, rotated, and managed by the encryption system itself rather than requiring external key management infrastructure. This automation maintains encryption strength through multiple keys while reducing key management complexity through centralized automated control.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a key management intermediary layer that handles the complexity of multiple encryption keys. This intermediary automatically manages key generation, distribution, rotation, and revocation, allowing the system to use multiple keys for security without exposing the full complexity to users or applications.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If encryption algorithms are made more complex, then security against attacks improves, but hardware requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvesecurity against attacksVSAvoidhardware requirements

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical/mathematical encryption algorithms with hardware-based cryptographic operations. By using dedicated cryptographic hardware modules and processor-intrinsic encryption instructions, the system achieves high security against attacks while reducing the computational overhead that would otherwise require more powerful general-purpose hardware.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11637816B2Systems and methods for dynamically and randomly encrypting and decrypting data

Publication Date: 2023.04.25 CYPHYX LLC

AI summary

A system and method for encrypting and decrypting information is presented. In some embodiments, an endpoint token management system is provided for facilitating dynamic and random encryption and decryption methods. The system and methods may be employed in virtually any system or network, and may be used to protect virtually any type of data, whether at rest (data storage), in motion (data transfer), or in use. In some embodiments, synchronization points are used as analogs for encryption/decryption keys, enabling the encrypting system and decrypting system to begin randomly altering encryption data in a like-manner, thereby creating a constantly changing encryption field that is virtually impossible to decrypt without authorization.