Dynamic Energy Selection for Defibrillation Shocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cardiac resuscitation systems face challenges in determining the optimal energy level for defibrillation shocks during ventricular fibrillation, leading to potential ineffective shocks and unnecessary side effects, as the energy requirements change over time and vary by patient conditions.

Innovation Solution

The system uses amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) values from electrocardiogram (ECG) data and trans-thoracic impedance to dynamically adjust the energy level for defibrillation shocks, providing real-time indications to rescuers on the likelihood of success and allowing for automatic or manual adjustment of energy levels based on patient-specific inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fixed energy levels are used for defibrillation shocks, then the device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the reliability of defibrillation success deteriorates because energy requirements change over time and vary by patient conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefibrillation success rateVSAvoidenergy selection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts defibrillation energy levels based on real-time AMSA values and treatment phase, transitioning from static fixed-energy protocols to adaptive dynamic energy selection. The energy level changes automatically as the patient's cardiac condition evolves during resuscitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses AMSA (amplitude spectrum area) values derived from ECG monitoring as feedback to continuously adjust energy delivery. The feedback loop measures cardiac electrical activity, interprets AMSA trends, and modifies subsequent shock energy levels accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If higher energy levels are delivered to ensure defibrillation success, then the reliability of defibrillation is improved, but the object-affected harmful factors increase due to potential tissue damage and side effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefibrillation success rateVSAvoidtissue damage from excessive energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the energy parameter dynamically based on AMSA values and treatment phase. Instead of delivering consistently high energy, the system adjusts energy levels to match the patient's actual cardiac condition, delivering higher energy only when AMSA indicates it is needed and lower energy when sufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system avoids excessive energy delivery by using AMSA-guided partial action - delivering just enough energy to achieve defibrillation based on real-time cardiac assessment. This prevents the harmful effects of overly aggressive high-energy shocks while maintaining adequate defibrillation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If energy levels are dynamically adjusted based on AMSA values and treatment phase, then the adaptability to patient conditions is improved, but the device complexity and measurement requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy adjustment to patient conditionsVSAvoidsignal processing and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing ECG monitoring electrodes and signal processing infrastructure for multiple purposes - both for standard cardiac rhythm monitoring and for AMSA-based energy level determination. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized sensors and simplifies the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system derives AMSA values from its own existing ECG monitoring signals without requiring external or additional measurement devices. The defibrillator uses its built-in ECG acquisition and processing capabilities to generate the adaptive energy control information it needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If real-time AMSA monitoring is used to guide energy selection, then the productivity of resuscitation is improved through optimized shock delivery, but the loss of time for signal processing and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresuscitation efficiencyVSAvoidsignal processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously calculates and monitors AMSA values in real-time during the resuscitation process, maintaining a running assessment of cardiac condition. This preliminary continuous monitoring allows immediate energy adjustment decisions without requiring separate analysis periods, eliminating delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The AMSA monitoring and energy adjustment process operates continuously throughout resuscitation without interruption. The system maintains constant surveillance of cardiac electrical activity and continuously updates energy recommendations, ensuring uninterrupted adaptive guidance throughout the resuscitation effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10589112B2Dynamic energy selection for defibrillation
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
  • US10589112B2 patent drawing
  • US10589112B2 patent drawing
  • US10589112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an aspect, a system for treating a patient in cardiac arrest is described and includes memory, one or more electronic ports for receiving signals from sensors for obtaining indications of an electrocardiogram (ECG) of the patient, one or more sensors for obtaining a transthoracic impedance of the patient, and a patient treatment module executable on one or more processing devices that is configured to generate, from the ECG, transform values that represent magnitudes of two or more frequency components of the ECG, and modify, based on at least one transform value, at least one shock delivery parameter.