Dynamic Epidemic Modeling via Open Markov and Abatement Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional epidemic modeling approaches are inadequate in capturing the complex and dynamic nature of opioid crises, failing to account for key factors such as differences in opioid use, treatment phases, and real-time data processing, which hinders accurate predictions and timely intervention strategies.

Innovation Solution

A cross-communicative multi-model system integrating an open Markov model, redress model, and abatement model, leveraging machine learning and artificial intelligence to analyze population data and simulate the impact of interventions, providing real-time projections and resource allocation for epidemic mitigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional epidemiologic models are used to analyze opioid epidemic data, then model simplicity is maintained, but the ability to capture complex and dynamic nature of the epidemic deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel simplicityVSAvoidepidemic trajectory accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the epidemic analysis into multiple specialized models (open Markov model for population transitions, redress model for intervention impact, abatement model for resource allocation) rather than using a single conventional model, allowing each component to handle specific aspects of the complex epidemic dynamics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple modeling approaches (Markov chains, machine learning algorithms, optimization models) into a composite integrated system that leverages the strengths of each component to accurately capture the complex and dynamic nature of the opioid epidemic while maintaining computational feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Use of energy by moving object

If traditional models process epidemic data, then computational requirements are low, but real-time prediction capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resource consumptionVSAvoidprediction response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and structuring epidemic data into standardized formats, pre-calculating transition probabilities for the Markov model, and pre-configuring the modeling framework, which enables rapid real-time predictions without requiring excessive computational resources during actual prediction events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical computational approaches with machine learning algorithms and automated optimization models that can process large volumes of epidemic data in real-time with reduced computational overhead, enabling timely predictions while maintaining efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If conventional models aggregate epidemic data, then data processing simplicity is maintained, but granular analysis capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing simplicityVSAvoidpopulation segment analysis precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by treating different population segments (e.g., prescription opioid users, heroin users, fentanyl users, treatment seekers, recovery populations) with specialized analysis parameters and transition probabilities specific to each group, enabling granular analysis while maintaining standardized data processing procedures through the open Markov model framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If single-entity treatment modeling is used, then model simplicity is maintained, but flexibility in modeling different treatment phases deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment model complexityVSAvoidtreatment phase differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments treatment into distinct phases (detoxification, stabilization, maintenance, recovery) with separate state transitions and intervention parameters in the open Markov model, allowing flexible modeling of different treatment intensities and approaches while maintaining a unified computational framework that preserves overall model simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240395420A1Systems and methods for dynamic epidemic modeling and abatement
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 MONUMENT ANALYTICS INC
  • US20240395420A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395420A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395420A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Many epidemics such as the opioid epidemic, are complex and dynamic, yet relatively little is known regarding its likely future impact and the potential mitigating impact of interventions to address it. The instant systems and methods provide a dynamic decision dynamic open Markov model, configured to provide updated estimates of the future magnitude of an epidemic, and project the potential association of key interventions with mitigation of the epidemic via a redress model and abatement model. This novel approach addresses the deficiencies of conventional approaches to modeling opioid epidemics by granularly analyzing populations via a framework including an open Markov model, redress model, abatement model, and evaluation model, that simulate the impact of interventions on the population, and forecast the remedies and resources required to abate the epidemic.