Dynamic Error Correction Target Adjustment for Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication networks fail to efficiently use UE location to optimize error correction targets, leading to suboptimal error correction and increased retransmissions due to static error correction settings that do not account for UE concentrations.

Innovation Solution

A wireless access node dynamically adjusts the error correction target based on the location and intensity of UE concentrations by identifying concentrations through UE reports and signal strength, modifying the target to allow more errors at edge locations and fewer errors at adjacent locations, thereby optimizing error correction and reducing unnecessary retransmissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static error correction targets are used, then device complexity is reduced, but network efficiency deteriorates due to unnecessary retransmissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction control complexityVSAvoidnetwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The error correction target is transformed from a static value to a dynamic parameter that automatically adjusts based on UE location. The system continuously monitors UE position and modifies the error correction target accordingly, allowing higher tolerance at edge locations and stricter tolerance at adjacent locations, thereby optimizing network efficiency without increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The error correction target parameter is changed dynamically based on UE location parameters. By linking the error correction target to location-based conditions, the system automatically adapts the parameter values to match network conditions, reducing unnecessary retransmissions while maintaining appropriate error correction standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If error correction target is increased at edge locations, then retransmissions are reduced, but data reliability may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretransmission efficiencyVSAvoiddata transmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different error correction targets are applied to different geographic locations within the network coverage area. Edge locations receive higher error correction targets (more tolerant) while adjacent locations maintain lower targets (stricter), allowing each location to operate with optimized parameters suited to its specific conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If error correction target is decreased at adjacent locations, then data reliability is improved, but network efficiency deteriorates due to excessive error correction

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE Quality-of-ServiceVSAvoidnetwork throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements location-specific error correction policies where adjacent locations with strong signal conditions receive stricter error correction targets to ensure high reliability, while edge locations receive more tolerant targets to maximize throughput, optimizing both reliability and efficiency simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11166194B1Location-based error correction for wireless data communications
Publication Date: 2021.11.02 T MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US11166194B1 patent drawing
  • US11166194B1 patent drawing
  • US11166194B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless access node controls error correction for wireless User Equipment (UEs). A radio wirelessly exchanges data with the wireless UEs and exchanges the data with a baseband unit. Some of the data is corrupt or missing. The baseband unit exchanges redundant data with the radio to replace a portion of the corrupt or missing data per an error correction target. The radio wirelessly exchanges the redundant data with the wireless UEs. The baseband unit identifies a concentration of the UEs at a location and responsively modifies the error correction target based on the location. The radio wirelessly exchanges additional data with the wireless UEs and exchanges the additional data with the baseband unit. Some of the additional data is corrupt or missing. The baseband unit exchanges redundant data with the radio to replace a portion of the corrupt or missing additional data per the modified error correction target.