Dynamic E-UTRA Reactivation Waiting Period Based on Mobility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for managing E-UTRA function in user equipment are inefficient, as they require a fixed waiting period for reactivation after deactivation, which can lead to prolonged service disruptions or unnecessary attempts to connect to a 4G network, affecting user experience.

Innovation Solution

A method where user equipment acquires mobility information to dynamically set a waiting period for deactivating and reactivating the E-UTRA function, allowing for shorter reactivation times based on mobility state, velocity, or change in mobility state, thereby optimizing handover and cell reselection operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed waiting period is used for reactivating E-UTRA function after deactivation, then the system avoids repeated connection attempts to non-functional networks, but the user equipment may experience prolonged service disruption or waste time and power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidservice disruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The waiting period is changed from a fixed value to a dynamic value that adapts based on network conditions and user equipment state. The system determines the waiting period based on factors such as deactivation cause, mobility state, and network configuration, allowing the reactivation timing to be optimized for each specific scenario rather than using a uniform fixed period

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The waiting period parameter is adjusted based on different conditions and parameters including deactivation cause (network-initiated vs. UE-initiated), mobility state (high, medium, low), and network configuration parameters. This allows the system to select appropriate waiting periods from different ranges or values based on the current operational context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a fixed waiting period is used for reactivating E-UTRA function, then the system simplifies the reactivation logic, but it causes time and power wastage from repeated connection attempts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactivation logic complexityVSAvoidpower wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The waiting period determination is made dynamic by introducing mobility state detection and conditional logic based on deactivation causes. The system monitors mobility state and uses this information to dynamically adjust the waiting period, preventing unnecessary reactivation attempts and associated energy waste while maintaining manageable complexity through structured decision rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the waiting period is set too long, then the user equipment avoids repeated connection attempts, but the user experience deteriorates due to prolonged service unavailability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection stabilityVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The waiting period parameter is adjusted based on multiple factors including deactivation cause, mobility state, and network configuration. By changing the parameter dynamically rather than using a fixed value, the system can shorten the waiting period when appropriate (improving user experience) while maintaining sufficient delay when needed (ensuring connection stability)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If the waiting period is set too short, then the user equipment can quickly resume 4G service, but it repeatedly attempts to connect to networks that have previously rejected registration requests

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice resumption speedVSAvoidconnection success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The waiting period is made dynamic and adaptive based on the deactivation cause and mobility state. When the deactivation was network-initiated or the UE is in high mobility state, a shorter waiting period is applied to enable quick service resumption. When deactivation was UE-initiated or in low mobility state, a longer period is used to avoid repeated rejection attempts, thus balancing productivity and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9357377B2Method of managing E-UTRA function of user equipment and related wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2016.05.31 ACER INC
  • US9357377B2 patent drawing
  • US9357377B2 patent drawing
  • US9357377B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a wireless communication system, when a user equipment needs to deactivate its E-UTRA function due to a network related failure cause, a waiting period is set according to the mobility information of the user equipment. When the waiting period has elapsed after deactivating the E-UTRA function, the user equipment is configured to reactivate the E-UTRA function.