Dynamic Evaluation Apparatus for Standardized Field Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current evaluation systems for domestic animals and other industrial fields face challenges in conducting objective evaluations that align with changing standardized methods, leading to insufficient safety and security assessments.

Innovation Solution

An evaluation apparatus and system that acquires evaluation method data, creates evaluation criteria information, and evaluates collected information based on these criteria, integrating data from field management systems to produce standardized evaluation results, enabling real-time output and visualization of results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If specific information is collected and unique evaluation methods are used, then evaluation can be conducted for unique production areas and conditions, but the ability to conduct objective evaluations aligning with changing standardized methods deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing standardized evaluation methodsVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system dynamically adapts to changing standardized methods by allowing the evaluation criteria to be updated and modified based on new standards. The system transitions from static, fixed evaluation parameters to dynamic, adjustable criteria that can evolve with changing industry standards, ensuring continued relevance and objectivity of evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation apparatus is designed with multi-functionality to handle both unique production area evaluations and standardized evaluation methods. It can process diverse data types and apply different evaluation frameworks, making it universally applicable across varying evaluation requirements while maintaining objective assessment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If manual evaluation processes are used, then flexibility in handling unique cases is improved, but evaluation costs and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation efficiencyVSAvoidtime required for evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical evaluation processes with automated computational evaluation. The evaluation apparatus automatically collects data, applies evaluation criteria, and generates results, substituting human manual analysis with automated processing that is both efficient and scalable, reducing time loss while maintaining evaluation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system performs self-service by automatically conducting evaluations without requiring extensive manual intervention. It autonomously processes collected information against evaluation criteria and generates evaluation results, enabling continuous operation and reducing the time and labor required for each evaluation cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive data collection is performed, then evaluation accuracy is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of data integration system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system segments the comprehensive data collection process into distinct modules, each responsible for collecting and processing specific types of information. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex data requirements while maintaining manageable system architecture, as each segment can be independently configured and maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation apparatus acts as an intermediary between data collection and evaluation processes. It receives comprehensive data from various sources, processes and integrates the information through standardized interfaces, and then applies evaluation criteria, thereby managing the complexity of data integration while ensuring accurate evaluation results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250021917A1Evaluation apparatus, system, method, and program
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 NEC COMM SYST LTD
  • US20250021917A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021917A1 patent drawing
  • US20250021917A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An evaluation apparatus includes: an evaluation method acquisition part configured to acquire evaluation method data from an evaluation method provision apparatus; an evaluation criteria creation part configured to create evaluation criteria information for evaluating collected information that integrates data collected from a field management system that manages field information based on the evaluation method data; an evaluation processing part configured to evaluate the collected information based on the evaluation criteria information and create an evaluation result.