Dynamic Event Scheduling via Machine Learning Message Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current event scheduling systems are labor-intensive and inefficient, particularly in large enterprises, as they require manual input and lack automated tools for standardization and quality control, leading to potential non-compliance with enterprise policies.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that includes a machine learning engine, a message handler, and a scheduling engine to automate dynamic and interactive event scheduling, utilizing natural language processing to analyze messages, optimize event parameters, and enforce compliance with enterprise standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual typing and communication methods are used for event scheduling, then individuals can obtain event information, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent scheduling efficiencyVSAvoidtime for manual event planning
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service scheduling by allowing individuals to automatically schedule events through natural language messages. The machine learning engine processes these messages autonomously, extracting event parameters and coordinating schedules without requiring manual typing or direct human-to-human coordination for each scheduling detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual typing and direct communication with an automated information processing system. The machine learning engine acts as an intelligent intermediary that automatically parses messages, extracts scheduling parameters, and coordinates events, substituting human manual operations with automated computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple individuals manually coordinate events across an enterprise, then event information can be exchanged, but the process becomes labor-intensive and difficult to standardize

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent coordination capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity for event management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning engine serves as an intelligent intermediary between individuals and the scheduling system. It receives natural language messages from users, automatically processes the information, and coordinates with the scheduling system to manage events. This intermediary layer simplifies the interaction model and enables standardized processing of diverse scheduling requests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides universal event management capabilities that can handle various types of events and coordination scenarios through a single standardized interface. The machine learning engine can process different message formats and extract relevant parameters universally, while the scheduling system manages diverse event types through unified templates and workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If manual event tracking is performed, then attendance information can be collected, but quality controls and standards enforcement become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent tracking accuracyVSAvoidease of enforcing quality controls
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms where the machine learning engine continuously monitors event participation and sends follow-up messages to confirm attendance. This feedback loop ensures accurate tracking of event participation and automatically enforces quality standards by verifying that required events are attended and documented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Attendees automatically confirm their participation through the messaging system, and the machine learning engine autonomously tracks and records attendance information. This self-service approach eliminates the need for manual tracking while ensuring accurate data collection and automatic enforcement of participation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250013989A1Systems and methods for dynamic message handling
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 JRNI INC
  • US20250013989A1 patent drawing
  • US20250013989A1 patent drawing
  • US20250013989A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a system having functionality that dynamic and interactive event scheduling. A message handler is provided to support automated message sequences, such as automated chat sessions and e-mail communications, in which the system exchanges messages with users in connection with scheduling or rescheduling events. A scheduling engine is provided to support creation and management of events, such as to create templates that may be used for event creation, as well as tracking attendance of events and other event-related information. A machine learning engine is provided to support analysis of messages exchanged between the system and users, where outputs of the machine learning engine may be used to identify optimal event parameters for events (e.g., optimal dates, times, locations, etc.)