Low-Profile Dynamic Extension Splint for Spasticity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals with flexor spasticity face difficulties in extending their fingers or thumb due to existing dynamic extension splints being bulky, unreliable, and not suitable for everyday use, as they often break and require frequent adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A low-profile dynamic extension splint designed without springs, wires, or rubber bands, utilizing a glove with a thumb jacket and flexible outrigger to bias fingers into an open position, made from durable and cost-effective materials, allowing for customization and improved dexterity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional dynamic extension splints use rubber bands, springs, or exposed straps to provide extension force, then the splint can achieve the desired finger extension function, but the device becomes unreliable as these components frequently break and require replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability of extension mechanismVSAvoiduse of multiple mechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the unreliable rubber bands, springs, and exposed straps from the splint design. Instead, it uses the intrinsic elastic properties of the glove material itself to provide the extension force, eliminating the components that frequently break and require replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters by selecting a glove material with specific elastic properties that can provide the necessary extension force. The elastic modulus and tensile strength of the glove material are optimized to replace the function of traditional mechanical spring or rubber band systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If traditional dynamic extension splints are designed with high profile outriggers and bulky structures, then they can provide sufficient extension force, but the splint becomes awkward for everyday use and socially embarrassing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort and social acceptanceVSAvoidextension force provided
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a thin, flexible glove as the primary structure instead of bulky rigid outriggers. The glove material provides the necessary extension force through its elastic properties while maintaining a low profile that is comfortable for everyday wear and socially acceptable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the glove material with strategic placement of rigid components (such as a rigid plate on the dorsal surface) to create a composite structure that provides sufficient extension force while maintaining a low-profile, comfortable design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional dynamic extension splints are custom-made in clinics or purchased from specialized catalogues, then they can be tailored to individual needs, but the cost and accessibility become limiting factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization for individual patientsVSAvoidcost and accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal splint system based on a standard glove that can be adapted to different hand sizes and conditions. The glove itself serves as the primary structural component, and customization is achieved through simple modifications rather than complex manufacturing processes, making the device inexpensive and widely accessible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If the splint uses a low-profile design with minimal components, then it becomes comfortable for everyday use, but the structural complexity must be reduced to only essential elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of componentsVSAvoiddurability without adjustment mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the structural support function and the extension force generation function into a single integrated system. The glove provides both the structural framework and the elastic recovery force, eliminating the need for separate adjustment mechanisms and reducing the total number of components while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The splint effectively trains individuals to grasp and release objects of varying sizes, enhancing daily activities by providing a durable, low-profile solution that minimizes social and physical impacts, with clinical trials showing significant improvement in gripping abilities.

Implementation Method 1

a durable, inexpensive, and low-profile solution to designing a splint capable of extending an individual's fingers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8235928B2Functional low-profile dynamic extension splint and methods for its use and manufacture
Publication Date: 2012.08.07 ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK
  • US8235928B2 patent drawing
  • US8235928B2 patent drawing
  • US8235928B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A low profile dynamic extension splint for biasing a person's fingers and/or a thumb in an open position.