Dynamic Fabrication Planning With Real-Time Plan Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fabrication systems face challenges in efficiently generating feasible fabrication plans and dynamically adjusting during the fabrication process due to the complexity of digital models and the need for minimal human intervention, often resulting in inefficiencies and material waste.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic fabrication system with an automated fabrication engine that processes digital models to generate fabrication plans, employs a scoring mechanism to select feasible plans, and monitors execution in real-time to iteratively adjust the process, prioritizing constraints based on structural integrity and cosmetic appearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automated fabrication systems generate fabrication plans from digital models with many possible valid outcomes, then the system achieves minimal human intervention, but the complexity of selecting an appropriate fabrication plan increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated fabrication plan generationVSAvoidfabrication plan selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the fabrication plan selection problem by changing the parameter space from evaluating multiple valid outcomes to scoring based on feasibility metrics. The scoring mechanism assigns numerical values to different plan attributes, converting a complex qualitative selection process into a quantitative optimization problem that can be solved automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual evaluation and selection of fabrication plans with an automated scoring mechanism. Instead of human experts manually assessing each possible fabrication plan, the system uses computational algorithms to automatically score and rank plans based on predefined criteria, substituting mechanical human judgment with automated computational evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the fabrication system evaluates all possible end results to ensure feasibility, then the reliability of the fabrication plan increases, but the time required to generate the fabrication plan increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication plan feasibilityVSAvoidfabrication plan generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The scoring mechanism evaluates only the most critical feasibility aspects of each fabrication plan rather than exhaustively analyzing all possible outcomes. By focusing on key scoring dimensions, the system achieves sufficient reliability without the computational burden of complete evaluation, applying partial action to the most important plan attributes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary scoring and filtering of fabrication plans before detailed evaluation. By pre-assessing plans based on scoring criteria, the system eliminates clearly infeasible options early in the process, reducing the time required for subsequent detailed feasibility analysis while maintaining overall plan reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If the fabrication system performs detailed monitoring and evaluation of each task execution, then the manufacturing precision increases, but the computational resources and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system applies different levels of evaluation detail to different tasks based on their importance and risk profile. Critical tasks receive detailed monitoring and evaluation, while less critical tasks receive streamlined assessment. This local differentiation of quality in monitoring ensures manufacturing precision for important operations while reducing computational resource consumption overall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10895870B2Dynamic fabrication engine
Publication Date: 2021.01.19 INTRINSIC INNOVATION LLC
  • US10895870B2 patent drawing
  • US10895870B2 patent drawing
  • US10895870B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, devices, and other techniques for a dynamic fabrication system. In some implementations, a computing system obtains a digital model of a physical structure. A fabrication plan for the physical structure is generated. The fabrication plan is provided to a fabrication system to execute the automated fabrication procedure according to the fabrication plan. A set of operations are performed for each of at least a subset of tasks from a set of tasks executed by the fabrication system during an automated fabrication procedure to identify an adjusted fabrication plan. The fabrication system is directed to continue execution of the automated fabrication procedure according to the adjusted fabrication plan.