Dynamic Facet Ranking via Supervised Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current facet generation and ranking technologies are inefficient and prone to human error, as they rely on manual, unsupervised processes for generating and ranking facets, leading to increased time and error in information retrieval.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a supervised machine learning algorithm to dynamically generate and rank facets based on a performed query, using a search engine algorithm to identify indicative markers, select relevant facets, and assign weighted values for prioritization, thereby reducing human error and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual facet generation and ranking processes are used, then human oversight and customization are possible, but time consumption and human errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of facet generationVSAvoidtime for facet generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical facet generation and ranking processes with an automated machine learning system. The ML algorithm automatically generates facets from query data and ranks them based on learned patterns, eliminating human manual intervention while maintaining or improving accuracy through supervised learning and quantitative similarity measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service facet generation where the machine learning model autonomously processes queries, identifies indicative markers, generates relevant facets, and ranks them without human intervention. The system serves itself by automatically training on data and improving its facet generation capabilities over time through the supervised learning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual facet ranking is performed, then human judgment can be applied, but productivity and efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacet generation speedVSAvoidcomplexity of ranking system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the complex qualitative judgment of manual facet ranking into quantitative parameter-based ranking. The system calculates quantitative similarity values between facets and indicative markers, assigns numerical weights to facets based on their relevance, and ranks them using calculated overall scores. This parameter transformation simplifies the ranking process while maintaining sophistication through mathematical measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning algorithm acts as an intermediary between the raw query data and the final facet presentation to users. The ML model processes the complex task of facet generation and ranking, translating unstructured query information into organized, ranked facets. This intermediary handles the complexity internally while presenting simplified results to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If unsupervised facet generation is used, then automation is achieved, but errors and inaccuracies increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of facet rankingVSAvoidlevel of automated processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements supervised machine learning where the system learns from labeled training data that provides feedback on correct facet generation and ranking. The model adjusts its parameters based on feedback from training examples, improving its accuracy over time. This feedback mechanism ensures high reliability while maintaining full automation in production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary training action before actual facet generation, where the machine learning model is trained on labeled datasets to learn correct facet ranking patterns. This preliminary supervised learning phase prepares the model to automatically generate accurate facets without human intervention during actual use, combining the benefits of supervision and automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11941010B2Dynamic facet ranking
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11941010B2 patent drawing
  • US11941010B2 patent drawing
  • US11941010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention provide a computer system, a computer program product, and a method that comprises analyzing a performed query by identifying a plurality of indicative markers based on a pre-stored classification database associated with the performed query; generating a plurality of facets based on the analysis of the performed query; selecting at least two facets within the generated plurality of facets by determining a quantitative similarity value between each respective facet and the plurality of identified indicative markers associated with the performed query; dynamically ranking the selected facets by prioritizing the selected facets based on a calculated overall score associated with assigned weighted values for each selected facet in the generated plurality of facets using a supervised machine learning algorithm; and displaying the dynamically ranked facets within a user interface of a computing device associated with a user.