Dynamic Feature Provisioning for Licensed Software Sessions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software delivery systems often provide features to client devices regardless of user privileges, licensing, and compatibility, leading to inefficiencies, complexity, and potential security risks, as well as requiring manual updates and supporting multiple incompatible versions.

Innovation Solution

A server system dynamically provides software application features based on user privileges, licensing, and compatibility, ensuring only entitled and compatible features are delivered to client computers, with the ability to update and manage feature versions remotely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If all software features are provided to client devices regardless of user privileges, then feature availability is maximized, but system complexity and security risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature availabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The software feature set is segmented into multiple subsets based on user privileges, licensing, and compatibility. The server divides features into different categories (e.g., premium features, basic features, incompatible features) and delivers only the appropriate subset to each client device, reducing system complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The server performs preliminary assessment of user privileges, licensing status, and device compatibility before feature delivery. By evaluating these factors in advance and pre-filtering the feature set, the system avoids delivering incompatible or unauthorized features, thereby reducing complexity and security risks while maintaining high feature availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If all software features are delivered to client devices, then feature completeness is improved, but load time and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature completenessVSAvoidload time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The server extracts and delivers only the necessary subset of features required for each user based on their privileges and device compatibility. By removing unnecessary features from the delivery set, the system maintains feature completeness for authorized users while significantly reducing download size and load time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by delivering exactly the right amount of features needed - no more, no less. Instead of delivering the complete feature set to all users, the server provides a tailored partial set that matches each user's entitlement and device capabilities, optimizing load time while maintaining functional completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If manual updates are required for software features, then version control is simplified, but user productivity and system efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveversion control simplicityVSAvoiduser productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automated updates where the server automatically detects, downloads, and installs feature updates on client devices without requiring manual user intervention. The server manages version control and automatically synchronizes clients with the latest authorized features, maintaining simple version control while significantly improving user productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where client devices report their current feature versions and compatibility status to the server, which then automatically provides appropriate updates. This automated feedback mechanism ensures timely updates without manual intervention, balancing version control simplicity with high user productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Stability of the object's composition

If multiple versions of software features are supported simultaneously, then backward compatibility is maintained, but device complexity and maintenance burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackward compatibilityVSAvoidmaintenance burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the feature set delivered to each client based on their specific version and compatibility requirements. Rather than statically supporting multiple versions simultaneously, the server dynamically evaluates client capabilities and delivers the appropriate version subset, maintaining backward compatibility while minimizing maintenance complexity through on-demand version provisioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12511438B2Dynamic provision of software application features
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US12511438B2 patent drawing
  • US12511438B2 patent drawing
  • US12511438B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples provide a server system for dynamic provision of elements features of a software application. The server includes an electronic processor configured to receive, from a client computer, session identifier and access information of a client software session running on the client computer and determine a set of session identity factors at least including licenses, user privileges, compatibilities, and application feature availabilities associated with the client software session. The electronic processor determines, from a set of application features, a first subset of application features to which the client software session is entitled based on an intersection of availability, compatibility, user privilege, and licensing of each respective application feature. The electronic processor delivers the first subset of application features to the client software session, causing each of the first subset of application features to load and render on a user interface of the client computer.