Dynamic Feature Set Selection for Accurate Content Generation Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning systems face challenges in selecting features for training and classification, which is computationally intensive, resource-consuming, prone to errors, and results in inaccurate predictions due to manual intervention and inefficient feature selection.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous feature selection model generates a dynamic framework feature set using exploratory feature sets, normalized scores, and machine learning models to optimize feature selection for content generation, reducing manual intervention and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual feature selection is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision (prediction accuracy) deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidfeature selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically selecting features through an autonomous feature selection model that evaluates multiple exploratory feature sets and selects the optimal framework feature set without requiring manual intervention, thereby improving prediction accuracy while reducing the complexity burden on operators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting the feature set based on normalized exploratory feature set scores and content generation objectives, transforming static manual feature selection into a dynamic automated process that adapts to different content generation scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive feature analysis is performed, then manufacturing precision (prediction accuracy) is improved, but use of energy (computational resources) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential features by generating multiple exploratory feature sets, normalizing their scores, and selecting the top-performing framework feature set, thereby obtaining high-accuracy predictions while reducing computational resources compared to analyzing all possible features exhaustively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by evaluating a manageable number of exploratory feature sets rather than all possible features, using normalized scores to identify the sufficient subset that achieves accurate predictions without excessive computational expenditure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If feature selection is performed manually, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature selection efficiencyVSAvoidfeature selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous feature selection model performs self-service by automatically evaluating and selecting features without manual intervention, significantly reducing feature selection time and improving productivity while eliminating the time loss associated with manual processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-generating multiple exploratory feature sets and pre-calculating their normalized scores, enabling rapid selection of the optimal framework feature set without time-consuming manual analysis during deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250371410A1Autonomously-generated, dynamic feature set for a content generation learning model
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 STATSKETCH INC
  • US20250371410A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371410A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371410A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example apparatus, computer-implemented method, and computer program product for autonomously training a content generation framework using an autonomously-generated dynamic framework feature set is provided. An example apparatus may include instructions configured to cause the apparatus to receive a user experience content dataset having target client characteristics related to a plurality of target clients. The apparatus may be further configured to generate exploratory feature sets including target client characteristics, and generate a normalized exploratory feature set score based on one or more content generation objectives. The apparatus further configured to generate a dynamic framework feature set comprised of selected features of the user experience content dataset, and train a content generation learning model based on the dynamic framework feature set to determine content data objects customized for the target clients.