Dynamic Financial Stability Assessment Using Time-Series Trend Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current credit scoring models fail to accurately assess a customer's financial stability over time, as they primarily focus on immediate repayment likelihood and do not account for changes in a customer's economic and financial situation, which are crucial for long-term creditworthiness.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that captures dynamic data as vectors, maps them to directionally similar template states, generates time series, and applies classification algorithms to identify trends in financial stability, leveraging cash flow and balance sheet components to assess stability over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If credit scoring models focus on immediate repayment likelihood using current credit bureau attributes, then the models can quickly assess creditworthiness, but they fail to capture changes in customer financial stability over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of creditworthiness assessmentVSAvoidaccuracy of long-term credit stability assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static credit scores into dynamic assessments by continuously tracking changes in credit attributes over time. The system computes rate-of-change metrics for credit scores and incorporates trend analysis to assess whether a customer's financial situation is improving or deteriorating, thereby capturing temporal dynamics in creditworthiness rather than relying on snapshots in time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a temporal dimension to traditional credit scoring by incorporating time-series data and rate-of-change calculations. Instead of evaluating creditworthiness at a single point in time, the system analyzes credit attributes across multiple time periods, introducing the dimension of time to the assessment and enabling detection of trends and patterns that static scores cannot capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If credit models use only current state attributes from credit bureaus, then the data collection process remains simple, but the models cannot reflect changes in customer economic and financial stability over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of data collectionVSAvoidinformation about temporal changes in financial stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically calculating rate-of-change metrics and trend analyses as data is collected and stored. Rather than requiring complex real-time processing, the system pre-computes changes in credit scores and stores them alongside the original data, enabling future analyses to leverage this prepared information without adding significant complexity to the data collection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous monitoring of credit attributes over time, maintaining an ongoing record of changes in a customer's financial situation. The system continuously updates credit scores, calculates rate-of-change metrics, and stores temporal data patterns, ensuring that the most current information about financial stability trends is always available for assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If the system tracks dynamic changes in customer financial attributes over time, then the accuracy of stability assessment improves, but the computational complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of financial stability measurementVSAvoidcomputational complexity of data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates specific rate-of-change metrics and trend indicators from the complex web of temporal data. By identifying and separating the most informative features (such as changes in credit scores, payment behavior patterns, and debt-to-income ratios over time), the system can focus computational resources on processing only the most relevant data elements rather than attempting to analyze every possible temporal variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw temporal data into standardized rate-of-change parameters and normalized trend metrics. By converting complex time-series data into simplified rate-of-change calculations and standardized financial ratios, the system reduces computational complexity while maintaining measurement precision. These transformed parameters can be more efficiently processed by machine learning models compared to raw temporal data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240320561A1Systems and methods for estimating stability of a dataset
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 SYNCHRONY BANK
  • US20240320561A1 patent drawing
  • US20240320561A1 patent drawing
  • US20240320561A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed embodiments may provide a framework to measure and leverage the observable attributes that most directly affect the data stability of a customer. In addition, embodiments track the dynamics of the observable components that sustain the data stability of a customer. Embodiments may be used to estimate the stability of a variety of conditions for various contexts, such as the stability of a computing system over time.