Dynamic Firewall Configuration for Cloud Security Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Information security architects and GRC personnel face challenges in validating and maintaining security technical controls in dynamically changing computing environments, particularly in distributed, virtualized, or cloud computing systems where components and environments change frequently.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that dynamically configures and controls security features by identifying assets, detecting attribute changes, and modifying firewall configurations in response to environmental changes, user input, and security events, ensuring compliance with predefined security benchmarks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If security controls are manually configured and validated in distributed computing environments, then security validation can be performed with current tools, but the time and resources required increase significantly due to frequent environmental changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity validation accuracyVSAvoidtime for security control validation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables security controls to self-validate by automatically monitoring their own configuration state and comparing it against required security policies. The security control apparatus performs self-assessment without requiring external manual validation, continuously checking whether its configuration matches the desired security state and automatically reporting compliance status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where security controls monitor their own configuration changes and receive feedback about their compliance status. The apparatus compares current configuration state against policy requirements, receives feedback on deviations, and can automatically adjust or report the status of security controls to maintain compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If security controls are manually monitored in dynamic computing environments, then security posture can be assessed, but the complexity of tracking frequent changes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity posture assuranceVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Security controls automatically monitor and report their own configuration state without requiring external monitoring systems. Each security control apparatus performs self-assessment of its configuration, continuously evaluating whether it maintains the required security posture and automatically communicating its status to relevant stakeholders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors changes in configuration parameters of security controls by detecting modifications to security-relevant attributes. When parameter changes are detected, the apparatus automatically re-evaluates compliance status and updates security posture assessments, enabling dynamic tracking without complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional security validation methods are used in virtualized and cloud computing systems, then existing security frameworks can be applied, but the frequency of environmental changes makes continuous validation impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity framework compatibilityVSAvoidvalidation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous security validation by constantly monitoring configuration changes and maintaining up-to-date compliance assessments. Rather than periodic validation, the apparatus continuously evaluates security control configurations as they change, ensuring uninterrupted security posture knowledge in dynamic virtualized and cloud environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The security validation system adapts dynamically to changing environments by automatically detecting configuration changes and adjusting its validation process accordingly. The apparatus modifies its monitoring behavior based on detected changes, intensifying validation when changes occur and maintaining continuous awareness of security posture without requiring complete re-validation cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10862920B2Systems and methods for dynamic network security control and configuration
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 CATBIRD NETWORKS
  • US10862920B2 patent drawing
  • US10862920B2 patent drawing
  • US10862920B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method according to one embodiment of the present disclosure includes identifying, by a computer system, an asset associated with a group; detecting a change in an attribute of the asset; and in response to detecting the change in the attribute of the asset, modifying, by the computer system, a configuration setting for a firewall. Among other things, the embodiments of the present disclosure can perform dynamically configure and control security features in response to changes in the computing environment, including asset attribute changes, security events, operational events, user input and environmental changes. Embodiments of the present disclosure thereby help to quickly maintain or change the security posture of a system and maintain the level of compliance with set of predefined security benchmarks or codified best practices.