Dynamic Form Prose Summary for Input Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulties in comprehending and accurately completing electronic forms due to short, non-explanatory prompts and industry-specific jargon, often leading to errors in input submission.

Innovation Solution

A method and user interface that generate prose based on form inputs, allowing users to receive requests for modifications and incorporate these modifications into a summary, enhancing comprehension and reducing errors through a graphical user interface with a parser, data repository, and text generator module.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If short non-explanatory prompts are used in forms, then the form structure remains simple and compact, but user comprehension and accuracy of input decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform structureVSAvoiduser comprehension
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The form is segmented into multiple sections or groups, with each section containing related prompts. This allows the form to maintain a simple overall structure while providing detailed explanations within each segment, resolving the contradiction between form compactness and user comprehension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary explanation layer is introduced between the prompt and the input field. This intermediary provides contextual information, definitions, or guidance without altering the basic form structure, thereby improving user comprehension while maintaining form simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If industry-specific jargon is included in forms, then professional accuracy is improved, but user understanding and completion accuracy decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprofessional accuracyVSAvoiduser understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Industry-specific jargon is used selectively in specific sections of the form where it is most appropriate, while other sections use plain language. This localized application of technical terminology maintains professional accuracy in critical areas while ensuring general understandability throughout the form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Definitions, glossaries, or explanatory tooltips are introduced as intermediaries next to or near industry-specific terms. These intermediaries provide context and meaning for technical jargon without removing the professional terminology, thereby maintaining both accuracy and understandability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If users must review and reread prompts to check inputs, then input accuracy can be improved, but time consumption and user frustration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput accuracyVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Real-time feedback mechanisms are implemented that automatically validate user inputs against the prompts and provide immediate confirmation or correction suggestions. This feedback loop ensures input accuracy without requiring users to manually review and reread prompts, thereby reducing time consumption and frustration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The form system pre-checks and validates inputs as users enter them, performing accuracy verification in advance rather than requiring post-entry review. This preliminary validation action ensures accuracy while minimizing the time users need to spend reviewing their responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8352850B1Dynamic paragraphs
Publication Date: 2013.01.08 INTUIT INC
  • US8352850B1 patent drawing
  • US8352850B1 patent drawing
  • US8352850B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for entering input into a form involves receiving prose based on the form and a first input, receiving a request for a second input, where the request is based on the first input, submitting the second input in response to the request, where the second input contains a modification to the prose, where the second input is incorporated into the prose to obtain a summary that enables comprehension of the form.