Dynamic Fraud Detection Mechanism for Secure Service Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conservative user authentication and fraud prevention mechanisms often lead to customer frustration by improperly blocking authorized users from accessing secure services, particularly in scenarios where the risk of fraud is low.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that assesses the risk of fraud by correlating access information and requested actions with stored user data, allowing access even with incorrect passwords if the fraud score is low, based on factors such as password similarity, access history, and user profile, and adjusts security levels dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conservative user authentication and fraud prevention mechanisms are implemented, then fraud protection is improved, but user access convenience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud protectionVSAvoiduser access convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes security parameters (fraud scores, risk thresholds) based on real-time analysis of access patterns, device characteristics, and behavioral data. This allows the system to adjust its security posture continuously, granting easier access when risk is low and imposing stricter controls when risk increases, thereby resolving the contradiction between fraud protection and user convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication mechanism transitions from static, conservative rules to dynamic, adaptive security assessments. The system continuously evaluates multiple factors (device fingerprint, access history, behavioral patterns) and adjusts authentication requirements in real-time, allowing authorized users to experience smooth access while maintaining strong fraud protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If strict authentication requirements are enforced, then security is improved, but false positives increase blocking authorized users

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidfraud detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the authentication process into multiple independent evaluation dimensions (device characteristics, access patterns, behavioral analysis, risk scoring). Each dimension is assessed separately and combined to form an overall fraud risk determination, reducing false positives by avoiding over-reliance on any single authentication factor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces fraud scoring and risk assessment as intermediary mechanisms between strict authentication rules and final access decisions. This intermediary layer analyzes multiple signals and provides nuanced risk evaluations, allowing the system to distinguish between genuine fraud attempts and legitimate unusual access patterns, thereby reducing false positives while maintaining security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10320800B2Fraud detection mechanism
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10320800B2 patent drawing
  • US10320800B2 patent drawing
  • US10320800B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include methods, systems and computer program products for providing access to a secure service. Aspects include receiving, from a user device, a request to access a secure service, the request including access information and receiving, from the user device, a requested action on the secure service. Aspects also include correlating the access information and the requested action with stored information associated with the user device and performing the requested action, in response to said correlating.