Dynamic Fractional Frequency Reuse Allocation in LTE Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current small cell RAN technologies face inefficiencies in frequency reuse, particularly in 3D deployments like multi-floor buildings, where static frequency allocation for cell-edge users is wasteful and distributed algorithms are slow to adapt to changing network conditions, limiting spectral efficiency and resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a hierarchical architecture with a central controller that dynamically computes fractional frequency reuse (FFR) allocations and configures individual MAC schedulers within each radio node, using interference graphs and heuristic algorithms to optimize frequency usage based on UE loads and interference patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If static frequency allocation is used for cell-edge users, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but spectral efficiency is reduced due to wasteful resource allocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic frequency allocation where the FFR parameter is adjusted in real-time based on network conditions, UE buffer occupancy, and interference measurements. The central controller continuously updates the FFR configuration for different cell types (macro, pico, femto) and user categories (cell-edge, interior) to optimize spectral efficiency while maintaining manageable complexity through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If distributed algorithms are used for frequency coordination, then system autonomy is maintained, but adaptation speed to changing network conditions is slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation speedVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a central controller as an intermediary between radio nodes and the core network. This controller collects interference measurements, UE buffer occupancy information, and traffic load data from multiple radio nodes, computes optimal FFR parameters centrally, and distributes configurations back to the nodes. This intermediary approach enables fast adaptation to changing conditions while managing coordination complexity through centralized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If FFR is dynamically computed with centralized control, then spectral efficiency is improved through accurate real-time decisions, but system complexity increases due to centralized processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network into hierarchical levels: a central controller for global optimization and radio nodes for local execution. The central controller handles high-level FFR parameter computation based on aggregate network state, while individual radio nodes execute local MAC scheduling and resource allocation. This segmentation allows dynamic FFR computation to improve spectral efficiency without requiring every node to perform complex centralized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary computation of FFR parameters at the central controller based on predicted traffic patterns and historical interference data. These pre-computed configurations are then distributed to radio nodes before actual data transmission begins, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions proactively rather than reactively, thereby improving spectral efficiency while reducing real-time processing complexity at individual nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9510205B2Load-based dynamic fractional frequency reuse in an LTE network
Publication Date: 2016.11.29 ANI ACQUISITION SUB LLC
  • US9510205B2 patent drawing
  • US9510205B2 patent drawing
  • US9510205B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A services node or central controller or coordinator is provided that dynamically computes fractional frequency reuse allocation among user equipment in a radio access network. The central controller or coordinator communicates the fractional frequency reuse allocation and configures the individual MAC schedulers within each radio node in the radio access network. Inputs to the central coordinator may include its serving radio node, a detected set of radio nodes, and information about user equipment buffer status both in the downlink and uplink. In one implementation, interference graphs are constructed for downlinks and uplink separately and the same are used with a heuristic independent set algorithm to compute the frequency allocation.