Function Recommendation System Using Dynamic Degree Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information processing apparatuses only recommend functions based on user usage history, failing to suggest useful functions that have not been used, thus limiting user convenience in discovering suitable functions.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that includes a storage unit associating function attribute information, user operation information, and recommendation degree information, with a recommendation degree updating unit, a recommended function determining unit, and a display control unit to prioritize and display useful functions based on usage history and external data, providing timely recommendations and adjusting standards based on usage patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If recommendation is made only based on already used functions, then the manipulation convenience of used functions is improved, but the discovery of new useful functions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation convenienceVSAvoidfunction discovery capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects user operation information and usage history, analyzes this feedback data, and uses it to dynamically generate recommendations. The recommendation degree information is updated based on user interactions, creating a closed-loop feedback system that continuously improves recommendation quality while balancing familiarity and novelty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates and stores recommendation degree information for various functions before user interaction occurs. This preliminary preparation allows the system to quickly provide both familiar function reminders and novel function suggestions without delaying user operations, thereby improving both manipulation convenience and function discovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If recommendation degree is increased for used functions, then the convenience of manipulating familiar functions is improved, but the recommendation accuracy for new useful functions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefamiliar function convenienceVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the recommendation degree parameter based on multiple factors including usage frequency, recency of use, and user preferences. By changing this parameter adaptively rather than statically prioritizing used functions, the system maintains convenience for familiar functions while accurately identifying and recommending new useful functions that match user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The recommendation system transitions from a static approach to a dynamic one where recommendation degrees are continuously updated based on real-time user operations and usage patterns. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to adapt to changing user needs, maintaining high convenience for familiar functions while improving accuracy in suggesting new useful functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Quantity of substance

If multiple functions are recommended based on usage history, then the completeness of function recommendations is improved, but the information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of recommended functionsVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly processing all functions with the same complexity, the system applies different processing depths to different functions based on their recommendation degrees and user relevance. High-priority functions receive more detailed analysis while lower-priority functions receive streamlined processing, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive recommendation coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8606797B2Information processing apparatus and information processing method
Publication Date: 2013.12.10 SATURN LICENSING LLC
  • US8606797B2 patent drawing
  • US8606797B2 patent drawing
  • US8606797B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided an information processing apparatus including a storage unit where function attribute information, user operation information, and recommendation degree information are recorded to be associated with one another, the attribute information indicating an attribute about a function of a predetermined device, the operation information indicating content of a predetermined user operation input to the device, and the degree information indicating a recommendation degree which serves as a reference for outputting, on a priority basis, display for recommending use of the function to a display apparatus, a recommendation degree information updating unit that updates, when a predetermined user operation is input, the degree information to increase the degree associated with function attribute information, and a recommended function determining unit that determines, based on the degree information recorded in the unit, a function with a highest degree as a recommended function.