Dynamic Function Replacement in Image Forming Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In information processing systems, especially in image forming systems, there is a challenge in effectively utilizing the functions of new apparatuses compared to existing ones, as the levels of functionality can differ, leading to suboptimal performance and inefficient resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

An information processing system that includes an acquisition unit to compare the functional levels of new and existing apparatuses and a replacement unit to automatically swap functions when the new apparatus has a higher level of functionality, ensuring that the more advanced functions are utilized, thereby enhancing operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If functions are retained in existing apparatuses, then system stability is maintained, but functional performance and efficiency deteriorate due to outdated capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidfunctional performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic function allocation where the system continuously monitors and evaluates the functional levels of different apparatuses. Functions are not statically assigned but dynamically transferred from existing apparatuses to new apparatuses when the new apparatuses demonstrate higher functional capabilities, ensuring both stability through controlled transitions and performance improvement through progressive upgrades

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by comparing functional level indicators between existing and new apparatuses. When a new apparatus exhibits superior functional parameters (higher level information), the system triggers a function transfer, effectively changing the operational state from static function retention to dynamic function optimization based on measured performance parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual function transfer between apparatuses is implemented, then functional flexibility is achieved, but operational complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional flexibilityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated function transfer mechanisms. The management device automatically compares functional levels, determines transfer eligibility, and executes function transfers without requiring manual intervention. This eliminates the complexity of manual function management while maintaining full functional flexibility, as the system autonomously adapts to changing apparatus capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where functional level information from apparatuses is continuously collected, evaluated, and used to automatically trigger function transfers. This feedback mechanism enables the system to autonomously respond to capability changes, achieving functional flexibility through automated decision-making rather than complex manual procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If new apparatuses with higher functionality are introduced, then system performance is improved, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates due to redundant functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts redundant functions from new apparatuses by automatically transferring them to existing apparatuses that can perform the same functions. This extraction process eliminates resource waste by ensuring that each function is executed by the most appropriate apparatus, preventing duplicate function execution and optimizing overall resource utilization while maintaining improved system performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11122185B2Information processing system, image forming system, and non-transitory computer readable medium storing program
Publication Date: 2021.09.14 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US11122185B2 patent drawing
  • US11122185B2 patent drawing
  • US11122185B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing system includes an acquisition unit and a replacement unit. The acquisition unit acquires first level information indicating a level of a function of a first apparatus and second level information indicating a level of the function of a second apparatus. The replacement unit replaces the function of the second apparatus with the function of the first apparatus, in a case where the level indicated by the first level information acquired by the acquisition unit is higher than the level indicated by the second level information.